FXM.TO vs. QCE.TO
FXM.TO (CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF) and QCE.TO (Mackenzie Canadian Large Cap Equity Index ETF) are both Canada Equities funds - FXM.TO tracks the Morningstar Canada Target Value Index while QCE.TO tracks the Solactive Canada Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FXM.TO returned 19.13%/yr vs 15.15%/yr for QCE.TO. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FXM.TO charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for QCE.TO.
Performance
FXM.TO vs. QCE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXM.TO achieves a 18.11% return, which is significantly higher than QCE.TO's 13.60% return.
FXM.TO
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 3.42%
- 6M
- 14.85%
- YTD
- 18.11%
- 1Y
- 45.40%
- 3Y*
- 27.60%
- 5Y*
- 19.13%
- 10Y*
- 14.71%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.03%
QCE.TO
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 13.85%
- YTD
- 13.60%
- 1Y
- 32.96%
- 3Y*
- 23.11%
- 5Y*
- 15.15%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.76%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$211.28K | CA$184.82K | CA$281.27K | |
| CA$55.32K | CA$69.28K | CA$101.71K |
FXM.TO vs. QCE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXM.TO CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF | 18.11% | 38.54% | 30.05% | 5.79% | -1.19% | 31.47% | 6.16% | 24.14% | -16.38% |
QCE.TO Mackenzie Canadian Large Cap Equity Index ETF | 13.60% | 29.43% | 21.54% | 12.44% | -6.08% | 24.89% | 4.28% | 22.10% | -7.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXM.TO and QCE.TO is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2018 | 0.41 |
The correlation between FXM.TO and QCE.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (all time) to 0.57 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FXM.TO vs. QCE.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXM.TO
QCE.TO
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Real Estate
-
Industrials
Healthcare
-
-
Basic Materials
FXM.TO
QCE.TO
Energy
FXM.TO
QCE.TO
Financial Services
FXM.TO
QCE.TO
Utilities
FXM.TO
QCE.TO
Consumer Cyclical
FXM.TO
QCE.TO
Communication Services
FXM.TO
QCE.TO
Consumer Defensive
FXM.TO
QCE.TO
Technology
FXM.TO
QCE.TO
Real Estate
FXM.TO
QCE.TO
-
Industrials
FXM.TO
QCE.TO
Healthcare
FXM.TO
-
QCE.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXM.TO vs. QCE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FXM.TO
QCE.TO
FXM.TO vs. QCE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF (FXM.TO) and Mackenzie Canadian Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QCE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXM.TO | QCE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.75 | 1.50 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.51 | 4.26 | +1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.50 | 17.99 | +3.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXM.TO vs. QCE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXM.TO drawdown since its inception was -46.41%, which is greater than QCE.TO's maximum drawdown of -35.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXM.TO and QCE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXM.TO | QCE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.41% | -35.47% | -10.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.11% | -7.54% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.44% | -12.48% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.08% | -16.27% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -1.48% | +0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.64% | -3.66% | -0.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.08% | 1.78% | +0.30% |
Volatility
FXM.TO vs. QCE.TO - Volatility Comparison
CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF (FXM.TO) and Mackenzie Canadian Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QCE.TO) have volatilities of 2.53% and 2.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXM.TO | QCE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.53% | 2.62% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.27% | 8.39% | -0.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.25% | 11.62% | -0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.15% | 12.87% | +1.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 15.76% | +1.12% |
FXM.TO vs. QCE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXM.TO has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than QCE.TO's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXM.TO vs. QCE.TO - Dividend Comparison
FXM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than QCE.TO's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXM.TO CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF | 1.72% | 1.91% | 2.17% | 2.96% | 2.18% | 2.19% | 2.40% | 2.04% | 2.52% | 1.70% | 1.83% | 2.24% |
QCE.TO Mackenzie Canadian Large Cap Equity Index ETF | 2.04% | 2.30% | 3.01% | 3.49% | 3.38% | 2.57% | 3.17% | 3.18% | 2.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXM.TO and QCE.TO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QCE.TO is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QCE.TO is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for FXM.TO.
FXM.TO tracks Morningstar Canada Target Value Index, while QCE.TO tracks Solactive Canada Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: CI and Mackenzie. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for FXM.TO and 0.04% for QCE.TO.
Find the right allocation for FXM.TO and QCE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer