FXM.TO vs. FLVC.NEO

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FXM.TO (CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF) and FLVC.NEO (Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both Canada Equities funds - FXM.TO tracks the Morningstar Canada Target Value Index while FLVC.NEO tracks the Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FXM.TO returned 45.40% vs 36.38% for FLVC.NEO. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FXM.TO charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLVC.NEO.

Performance

FXM.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF (FXM.TO) and Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (FLVC.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXM.TO achieves a 18.11% return, which is significantly lower than FLVC.NEO's 21.78% return.

FXM.TO

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: 3.42%
• 6M: 14.85%
• YTD: 18.11%
• 1Y: 45.40%
• 3Y*: 27.60%
• 5Y*: 19.13%
• 10Y*: 14.71%
• ALL TIME*: 13.03%

FLVC.NEO

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 3.35%
• 6M: 23.34%
• YTD: 21.78%
• 1Y: 36.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 24.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLVC.NEO Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF	CA$134.83K	CA$145.15K	CA$488.47K
FXM.TO CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF	CA$211.28K	CA$184.82K	CA$281.27K

FXM.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FXM.TO CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF	18.11%	38.54%	24.38%
FLVC.NEO Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF	21.78%	21.15%	13.79%

Correlation

The correlation between FXM.TO and FLVC.NEO is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024	0.30

FXM.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FXM.TO	FLVC.NEO
Basic Materials	16.3%	0.4%
Energy	14.8%	8.8%
Financial Services	14.7%	43.0%
Utilities	14.2%	10.8%
Consumer Cyclical	10.4%	7.0%
Communication Services	9.2%	7.5%
Consumer Defensive	6.9%	6.9%
Technology	6.8%	2.0%
Real Estate	3.6%	-
Industrials	3.2%	13.7%
Healthcare	-	-

Return for Risk

FXM.TO vs. FLVC.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FXM.TO

FXM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 97
FXM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FXM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
FXM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
FXM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FXM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 96

FLVC.NEO

FLVC.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 98
FLVC.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FLVC.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
FLVC.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 98
FLVC.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FLVC.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FXM.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF (FXM.TO) and Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (FLVC.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FXM.TO	FLVC.NEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.99	5.06	-1.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.14	7.66	-2.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.75	2.02	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.51	12.45	-6.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.50	55.03	-33.53

FXM.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.99, which is comparable to the FLVC.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 5.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXM.TO and FLVC.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FXM.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXM.TO drawdown since its inception was -46.41%, which is greater than FLVC.NEO's maximum drawdown of -7.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXM.TO and FLVC.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FXM.TO	FLVC.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.41%	-7.89%	-38.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.11%	-3.21%	-4.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.44%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.08%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.65%	-0.50%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.64%	-0.80%	-3.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.08%	0.71%	+1.37%

Volatility

FXM.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF (FXM.TO) is 2.53%, while Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (FLVC.NEO) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that FXM.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLVC.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FXM.TO	FLVC.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.53%	2.84%	-0.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.27%	5.74%	+2.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.25%	7.91%	+3.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.15%	11.38%	+2.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.88%	11.38%	+5.50%

FXM.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXM.TO has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than FLVC.NEO's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

FXM.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Dividend Comparison

FXM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than FLVC.NEO's 4.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLVC.NEO Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF	4.70%	4.96%	0.95%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FXM.TO CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF	1.72%	1.91%	2.17%	2.96%	2.18%	2.19%	2.40%	2.04%	2.52%	1.70%	1.83%	2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FXM.TO and FLVC.NEO in my portfolio?

FXM.TO and FLVC.NEO have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FXM.TO or FLVC.NEO?

On fees, FLVC.NEO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FXM.TO or FLVC.NEO?

FLVC.NEO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for FXM.TO.

What is the main difference between FXM.TO and FLVC.NEO?

FXM.TO tracks Morningstar Canada Target Value Index, while FLVC.NEO tracks Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: CI and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for FXM.TO and 0.15% for FLVC.NEO.