FXM.TO vs. CRED.TO

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FXM.TO (CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF) and CRED.TO (CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FXM.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Canada Target Value Index, while CRED.TO is a Investment Grade Bonds fund actively managed by CI. FXM.TO is passively managed, while CRED.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FXM.TO returned 19.13%/yr vs 2.98%/yr for CRED.TO. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FXM.TO charges 0.64%/yr vs 1.94%/yr for CRED.TO.

Performance

FXM.TO vs. CRED.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF (FXM.TO) and CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund (CRED.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXM.TO achieves a 18.11% return, which is significantly higher than CRED.TO's 0.95% return.

FXM.TO

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: 3.42%
• 6M: 14.85%
• YTD: 18.11%
• 1Y: 45.40%
• 3Y*: 27.60%
• 5Y*: 19.13%
• 10Y*: 14.71%
• ALL TIME*: 13.03%

CRED.TO

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -0.39%
• 6M: 0.65%
• YTD: 0.95%
• 1Y: 2.65%
• 3Y*: 5.33%
• 5Y*: 2.98%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CRED.TO CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund	CA$22.02K	CA$36.37K	CA$30.13K
FXM.TO CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF	CA$211.28K	CA$184.82K	CA$281.27K

FXM.TO vs. CRED.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FXM.TO CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF	18.11%	38.54%	30.05%	5.79%	-1.19%	31.47%	9.61%
CRED.TO CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund	0.95%	2.77%	9.26%	6.00%	-3.41%	1.48%	4.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FXM.TO and CRED.TO is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2020	0.05

The correlation between FXM.TO and CRED.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (5 years) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FXM.TO vs. CRED.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FXM.TO

FXM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 97
FXM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FXM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
FXM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
FXM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FXM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 96

CRED.TO

CRED.TO Risk / Return Rank: 58
CRED.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
CRED.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
CRED.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 70
CRED.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
CRED.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FXM.TO vs. CRED.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF (FXM.TO) and CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund (CRED.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FXM.TO	CRED.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.99	1.43	+2.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.14	2.06	+3.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.75	1.30	+0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.51	1.75	+3.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.50	5.85	+15.65

FXM.TO vs. CRED.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.99, which is higher than the CRED.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXM.TO and CRED.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FXM.TO vs. CRED.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXM.TO drawdown since its inception was -46.41%, which is greater than CRED.TO's maximum drawdown of -10.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXM.TO and CRED.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FXM.TO	CRED.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.41%	-10.05%	-36.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.11%	-1.52%	-6.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.44%	-2.82%	-9.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.08%	-6.00%	-10.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.65%	-0.39%	-0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.64%	-1.45%	-3.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.08%	0.45%	+1.63%

Volatility

FXM.TO vs. CRED.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF (FXM.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.53% compared to CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund (CRED.TO) at 0.56%. This indicates that FXM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRED.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FXM.TO	CRED.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.53%	0.56%	+1.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.27%	1.45%	+6.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.25%	1.87%	+9.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.15%	2.69%	+11.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.88%	3.43%	+13.45%

FXM.TO vs. CRED.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXM.TO has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than CRED.TO's 1.94% expense ratio.

Dividends

FXM.TO vs. CRED.TO - Dividend Comparison

FXM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than CRED.TO's 2.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRED.TO CI Alternative Investment Grade Credit Fund	2.98%	2.96%	2.95%	3.13%	3.21%	3.01%	2.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FXM.TO CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF	1.72%	1.91%	2.17%	2.96%	2.18%	2.19%	2.40%	2.04%	2.52%	1.70%	1.83%	2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FXM.TO and CRED.TO in my portfolio?

FXM.TO and CRED.TO have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FXM.TO or CRED.TO?

On fees, FXM.TO is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FXM.TO or CRED.TO?

FXM.TO is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 1.94% for CRED.TO.

What is the main difference between FXM.TO and CRED.TO?

FXM.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while CRED.TO is Investment Grade Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for FXM.TO and 1.94% for CRED.TO.