FXIEX vs. HYMB
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE (FXIEX) and SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB).
FXIEX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Jun 24, 2012. HYMB is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Municipal Yield. It was launched on Apr 13, 2011.
Performance
FXIEX vs. HYMB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FXIEX vs. HYMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXIEX PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE | -0.72% | 3.37% | 5.16% | 8.92% | -10.89% | 2.19% | 7.22% | 8.45% | 1.00% | 7.71% |
HYMB SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF | 0.18% | 2.04% | 5.52% | 7.73% | -15.54% | 5.16% | 3.74% | 9.51% | 4.91% | 3.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXIEX achieves a -0.72% return, which is significantly lower than HYMB's 0.18% return. Over the past 10 years, FXIEX has outperformed HYMB with an annualized return of 2.74%, while HYMB has yielded a comparatively lower 2.46% annualized return.
FXIEX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- YTD
- -0.72%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 2.29%
- 3Y*
- 4.64%
- 5Y*
- 1.48%
- 10Y*
- 2.74%
HYMB
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -2.20%
- YTD
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 2.93%
- 3Y*
- 4.12%
- 5Y*
- 0.36%
- 10Y*
- 2.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FXIEX vs. HYMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXIEX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than HYMB's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FXIEX vs. HYMB — Risk / Return Rank
FXIEX
HYMB
FXIEX vs. HYMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE (FXIEX) and SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXIEX | HYMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.74 | 0.50 | +0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.06 | 0.62 | +0.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.12 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.48 | 0.60 | -0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.44 | 1.48 | -0.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXIEX | HYMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 0.50 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.06 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.22 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.43 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between FXIEX and HYMB is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FXIEX vs. HYMB - Dividend Comparison
FXIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than HYMB's 4.58% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXIEX PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE | 2.03% | 2.75% | 4.53% | 3.98% | 3.25% | 2.63% | 3.37% | 3.63% | 3.79% | 2.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HYMB SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF | 4.58% | 4.55% | 4.29% | 4.07% | 3.77% | 3.19% | 3.55% | 3.95% | 4.03% | 3.78% | 4.08% | 4.54% |
Drawdowns
FXIEX vs. HYMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXIEX drawdown since its inception was -15.25%, smaller than the maximum HYMB drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXIEX and HYMB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXIEX | HYMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.25% | -29.57% | +14.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.11% | -5.07% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.25% | -20.15% | +4.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.25% | -29.57% | +14.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.32% | -2.20% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.92% | -3.84% | +0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.83% | 2.06% | -0.23% |
Volatility
FXIEX vs. HYMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE (FXIEX) is 1.03%, while SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) has a volatility of 2.15%. This indicates that FXIEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FXIEX | HYMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.03% | 2.15% | -1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.31% | 2.88% | -0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.73% | 5.91% | -0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.30% | 6.63% | -2.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.07% | 11.35% | -7.28% |