FXI vs. FLXC.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.L).
FXI and FLXC.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FXI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE China 25 Index. It was launched on Oct 5, 2004. FLXC.L is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Jun 4, 2019. Both FXI and FLXC.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FXI vs. FLXC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FXI vs. FLXC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | -7.13% | 28.95% | 28.98% | -12.42% | -20.66% | -20.06% | 8.92% | 10.82% |
FLXC.L Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF | -7.21% | 32.15% | 19.36% | -12.74% | -22.72% | -20.67% | 31.22% | 16.03% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FXI having a -7.13% return and FLXC.L slightly lower at -7.21%.
FXI
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- -3.63%
- YTD
- -7.13%
- 6M
- -13.13%
- 1Y
- 1.94%
- 3Y*
- 9.04%
- 5Y*
- -3.44%
- 10Y*
- 3.03%
FLXC.L
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -6.88%
- YTD
- -7.21%
- 6M
- -13.58%
- 1Y
- 6.74%
- 3Y*
- 6.92%
- 5Y*
- -5.15%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FXI vs. FLXC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXI has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXC.L's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FXI vs. FLXC.L — Risk / Return Rank
FXI
FLXC.L
FXI vs. FLXC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXI | FLXC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.08 | 0.31 | -0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.28 | 0.57 | -0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.07 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.10 | 0.42 | -0.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.29 | 1.11 | -0.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXI | FLXC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 | 0.31 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.11 | -0.16 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.08 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between FXI and FLXC.L is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FXI vs. FLXC.L - Dividend Comparison
FXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, while FLXC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 2.60% | 2.42% | 1.76% | 3.17% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 2.69% | 2.31% | 2.69% | 2.90% |
FLXC.L Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FXI vs. FLXC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXI drawdown since its inception was -72.68%, which is greater than FLXC.L's maximum drawdown of -67.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXI and FLXC.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXI | FLXC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.68% | -67.90% | -4.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.74% | -15.45% | -1.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.14% | -62.78% | +7.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.87% | -34.31% | +7.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.27% | -31.82% | +0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.89% | 5.91% | -0.02% |
Volatility
FXI vs. FLXC.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.L) have volatilities of 6.74% and 6.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FXI | FLXC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.74% | 6.60% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.71% | 13.19% | +1.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.29% | 21.63% | +2.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.64% | 32.71% | -1.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.70% | 30.84% | -3.14% |