FXF vs. TIP
FXF (Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust) and TIP (iShares TIPS Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXF is a Currency fund tracking the Swiss Franc, while TIP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXF returned 1.06%/yr vs 2.53%/yr for TIP. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FXF charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for TIP.
Performance
FXF vs. TIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXF achieves a -0.80% return, which is significantly lower than TIP's 1.40% return. Over the past 10 years, FXF has underperformed TIP with an annualized return of 1.06%, while TIP has yielded a comparatively higher 2.53% annualized return.
FXF
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- -0.80%
- 6M
- -0.32%
- 1Y
- 1.23%
- 3Y*
- 4.05%
- 5Y*
- 1.88%
- 10Y*
- 1.06%
TIP
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 1.42%
- 1Y
- 4.76%
- 3Y*
- 4.00%
- 5Y*
- 0.91%
- 10Y*
- 2.53%
FXF vs. TIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXF Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust | -0.80% | 14.04% | -7.46% | 9.63% | -2.29% | -4.08% | 8.18% | 0.32% | -2.01% | 3.31% |
TIP iShares TIPS Bond ETF | 1.40% | 6.77% | 1.65% | 3.80% | -12.26% | 5.68% | 10.84% | 8.35% | -1.42% | 2.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXF and TIP is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2006 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXF vs. TIP — Risk / Return Rank
FXF
TIP
FXF vs. TIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF) and iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXF | TIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.24 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | 2.34 | -2.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.54 | 7.00 | -6.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXF vs. TIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXF drawdown since its inception was -35.58%, which is greater than TIP's maximum drawdown of -14.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXF and TIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXF | TIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.58% | -14.57% | -21.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.97% | -1.98% | -2.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.52% | -4.54% | -3.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.99% | -14.51% | +2.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.04% | -14.51% | -0.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.02% | -0.46% | -18.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.83% | -3.43% | -17.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.28% | 0.66% | +1.62% |
Volatility
FXF vs. TIP - Volatility Comparison
Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF) has a higher volatility of 1.81% compared to iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) at 1.03%. This indicates that FXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXF | TIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.81% | 1.03% | +0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.56% | 2.32% | +3.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.49% | 3.39% | +4.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.33% | 6.21% | +2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.57% | 5.74% | +1.83% |
FXF vs. TIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXF has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than TIP's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXF vs. TIP - Dividend Comparison
FXF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXF Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TIP iShares TIPS Bond ETF | 3.76% | 3.46% | 2.52% | 2.73% | 6.96% | 4.28% | 1.17% | 1.75% | 2.71% | 2.07% | 1.48% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXF and TIP have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXF has higher volatility (1.81%) compared to TIP (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXF dropped -35.58% vs TIP's -14.57%.
On 10-year performance, TIP leads with 2.53% vs 1.06% for FXF. On fees, TIP is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, TIP has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TIP has performed better with a 2.53% return vs 1.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TIP is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FXF.
TIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.76%, compared with 0.00% for FXF.
FXF is categorized as Currency, while TIP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. FXF tracks Swiss Franc, while TIP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FXF and 0.18% for TIP.
TIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXF and TIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer