PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXF vs. CWST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXF vs. CWST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF) and Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXF achieves a -2.51% return, which is significantly higher than CWST's -4.46% return. Over the past 10 years, FXF has underperformed CWST with an annualized return of 1.16%, while CWST has yielded a comparatively higher 26.34% annualized return.


FXF

1D
-0.36%
1M
-0.69%
6M
-1.20%
YTD
-2.51%
1Y
-1.57%
3Y*
1.94%
5Y*
1.98%
10Y*
1.16%
ALL TIME*
1.66%

CWST

1D
-2.23%
1M
7.58%
6M
-11.85%
YTD
-4.46%
1Y
-13.31%
3Y*
2.21%
5Y*
7.32%
10Y*
26.34%
ALL TIME*
5.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXF vs. CWST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXF
Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust
-2.51%14.04%-7.46%9.63%-2.29%-4.08%8.18%0.32%-2.01%3.31%
CWST
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
-4.46%-7.44%23.81%7.75%-7.15%37.89%34.59%61.57%23.76%85.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FXF and CWST is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2006

0.00

The correlation between FXF and CWST shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.07 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXF vs. CWST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXF
FXF Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXF Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXF Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

CWST
CWST Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
CWST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWST Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWST Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
CWST Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWST Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXF vs. CWST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF) and Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXFCWSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

0.96

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.24

-0.41

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.55

-0.75

+0.20

FXF vs. CWST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXF Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is higher than the CWST Sharpe Ratio of -0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXF and CWST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXF vs. CWST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXF drawdown since its inception was -35.58%, smaller than the maximum CWST drawdown of -98.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXF and CWST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXFCWSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.58%

-98.52%

+62.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.72%

-32.56%

+25.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.52%

-37.72%

+29.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.99%

-37.72%

+25.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.04%

-37.72%

+22.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.42%

-22.26%

+1.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.83%

-52.91%

+32.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

17.80%

-14.92%

Volatility

FXF vs. CWST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF) is 1.86%, while Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) has a volatility of 11.67%. This indicates that FXF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXFCWSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.86%

11.67%

-9.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.76%

28.86%

-23.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.44%

35.12%

-27.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.32%

27.64%

-19.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.57%

31.00%

-23.43%

Dividends

FXF vs. CWST - Dividend Comparison

Neither FXF nor CWST has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
CWST
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FXF
Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust
0.00%0.00%0.03%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXF and CWST have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CWST has higher volatility (11.67%) compared to FXF (1.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXF dropped -35.58% vs CWST's -98.52%.

FXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.21 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXF and CWST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer