FXED vs. DWAT
FXED (Sound Enhanced Fixed Income ETF) and DWAT (Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXED is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Sound Income Strategies, while DWAT is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Arrow Funds. Both are actively managed. FXED charges 2.33%/yr vs 1.83%/yr for DWAT.
Performance
FXED vs. DWAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FXED
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- YTD
- -0.68%
- 6M
- -0.29%
- 1Y
- 4.11%
- 3Y*
- 6.64%
- 5Y*
- 2.33%
- 10Y*
- —
DWAT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FXED vs. DWAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FXED Sound Enhanced Fixed Income ETF | -0.73% |
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF | 0.00% |
FXED vs. DWAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXED
DWAT
Financial Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
FXED
DWAT
Real Estate
FXED
DWAT
Basic Materials
FXED
-
DWAT
Communication Services
FXED
-
DWAT
Consumer Cyclical
FXED
-
DWAT
Consumer Defensive
FXED
-
DWAT
Energy
FXED
-
DWAT
Healthcare
FXED
-
DWAT
Industrials
FXED
-
DWAT
Technology
FXED
-
DWAT
Utilities
FXED
-
DWAT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXED vs. DWAT — Risk / Return Rank
FXED
DWAT
FXED vs. DWAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sound Enhanced Fixed Income ETF (FXED) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXED | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.09 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXED | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | — | — |
Drawdowns
FXED vs. DWAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXED drawdown since its inception was -19.70%, which is greater than DWAT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXED and DWAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXED | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.70% | 0.00% | -19.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.54% | 0.00% | -2.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.77% | 0.00% | -4.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | — | — |
Volatility
FXED vs. DWAT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXED | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.12% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.21% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.79% | 0.00% | +6.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.75% | 0.00% | +8.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.59% | 0.00% | +8.59% |
FXED vs. DWAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXED has a 2.33% expense ratio, which is higher than DWAT's 1.83% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXED vs. DWAT - Dividend Comparison
FXED's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.16%, while DWAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FXED Sound Enhanced Fixed Income ETF | 7.16% | 6.96% | 6.70% | 5.65% | 5.94% | 4.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, DWAT is cheaper at 1.83% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DWAT is cheaper with a 1.83% expense ratio, compared with 2.33% for FXED.
FXED has the higher dividend yield at 7.16%, compared with 0.00% for DWAT.
FXED is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while DWAT is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Sound Income Strategies and Arrow Funds. Their fees differ too: 2.33% for FXED and 1.83% for DWAT.
Find the right allocation for FXED and DWAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer