FXC vs. ACLO
FXC (Invesco CurrencyShares® Canadian Dollar Trust) and ACLO (TCW AAA CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXC is a Currency fund tracking the Canadian Dollar, while ACLO is a CLO fund actively managed by TCW. FXC is passively managed, while ACLO is actively managed. Over the past year, FXC returned -0.81% vs 5.32% for ACLO. At a correlation of -0.25, they often move in opposite directions. FXC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ACLO.
Performance
FXC vs. ACLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXC achieves a -0.74% return, which is significantly lower than ACLO's 2.19% return.
FXC
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- YTD
- -0.74%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- -0.81%
- 3Y*
- 0.26%
- 5Y*
- -1.74%
- 10Y*
- -0.15%
ACLO
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 2.19%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 5.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FXC vs. ACLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FXC Invesco CurrencyShares® Canadian Dollar Trust | -0.74% | 5.24% | -2.46% |
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF | 2.19% | 5.32% | 0.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXC and ACLO is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2024 | -0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXC vs. ACLO — Risk / Return Rank
FXC
ACLO
FXC vs. ACLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CurrencyShares® Canadian Dollar Trust (FXC) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXC | ACLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | 7.30 | -7.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | 14.87 | -15.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 3.41 | -2.44 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | 19.64 | -19.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.32 | 162.50 | -162.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXC | ACLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 | 7.30 | -7.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 5.09 | -5.14 |
Drawdowns
FXC vs. ACLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXC drawdown since its inception was -35.39%, which is greater than ACLO's maximum drawdown of -1.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXC and ACLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXC | ACLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.39% | -1.01% | -34.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.78% | -0.27% | -3.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.56% | 0.00% | -28.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.91% | -0.05% | -19.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 0.03% | +1.95% |
Volatility
FXC vs. ACLO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco CurrencyShares® Canadian Dollar Trust (FXC) has a higher volatility of 0.69% compared to TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) at 0.14%. This indicates that FXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXC | ACLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.69% | 0.14% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.25% | 0.57% | +2.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.49% | 0.73% | +3.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.37% | 1.08% | +5.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.66% | 1.08% | +5.58% |
FXC vs. ACLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ACLO's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXC vs. ACLO - Dividend Comparison
FXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than ACLO's 4.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF | 4.91% | 4.87% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FXC Invesco CurrencyShares® Canadian Dollar Trust | 0.26% | 0.55% | 2.23% | 2.01% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 0.75% | 0.42% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXC and ACLO have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXC has higher volatility (0.69%) compared to ACLO (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXC dropped -35.39% vs ACLO's -1.01%.
On 1-year performance, ACLO leads with 5.32% vs -0.81% for FXC. On fees, ACLO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ACLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ACLO has performed better with a 5.32% return vs -0.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ACLO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FXC.
ACLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 0.26% for FXC.
FXC is categorized as Currency, while ACLO is CLO. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FXC and 0.20% for ACLO.
ACLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.30 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXC and ACLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer