PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXB vs. CSHP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXB vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco CurrencyShares® British Pound Sterling Trust (FXB) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXB achieves a -1.17% return, which is significantly lower than CSHP's 1.83% return.


FXB

1D
-0.37%
1M
-1.63%
YTD
-1.17%
6M
-1.24%
1Y
-0.33%
3Y*
4.05%
5Y*
0.79%
10Y*
0.48%

CSHP

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.83%
6M
1.92%
1Y
3.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXB vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FXB and CSHP is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024

-0.00

The correlation between FXB and CSHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to -0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXB vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXB
FXB Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
FXB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXB Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXB Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FXB Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXB Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

CSHP
CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXB vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CurrencyShares® British Pound Sterling Trust (FXB) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXBCSHPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-11.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-27.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

6.46

-5.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.07

65.45

-65.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.15

381.67

-381.82

FXB vs. CSHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXB Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the CSHP Sharpe Ratio of 11.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXB and CSHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXB vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXB drawdown since its inception was -48.99%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXB and CSHP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXBCSHPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.99%

-0.08%

-48.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.53%

-0.06%

-4.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.64%

-0.04%

-30.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.54%

-0.00%

-27.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

0.01%

+2.24%

Volatility

FXB vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco CurrencyShares® British Pound Sterling Trust (FXB) has a higher volatility of 1.62% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.16%. This indicates that FXB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXBCSHPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.62%

0.16%

+1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.90%

0.27%

+4.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.57%

0.36%

+6.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.48%

0.41%

+8.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.87%

0.41%

+8.46%

FXB vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXB has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXB vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison

FXB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, less than CSHP's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CSHP
iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF
3.91%5.39%1.96%0.00%0.00%
FXB
Invesco CurrencyShares® British Pound Sterling Trust
2.24%2.44%3.25%2.59%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXB and CSHP have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXB has higher volatility (1.62%) compared to CSHP (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXB dropped -48.99% vs CSHP's -0.08%.

On 1-year performance, CSHP leads with 3.94% vs -0.33% for FXB. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CSHP has performed better with a 3.94% return vs -0.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FXB.

CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 2.24% for FXB.

FXB is categorized as Currency, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FXB and 0.20% for CSHP.

CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.09 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXB and CSHP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer