FXB vs. ACLO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FXB (Invesco CurrencyShares® British Pound Sterling Trust) and ACLO (TCW AAA CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXB is a Currency fund tracking the British Pound, while ACLO is a CLO fund actively managed by TCW. FXB is passively managed, while ACLO is actively managed. Over the past year, FXB returned -0.33% vs 5.27% for ACLO. At a correlation of -0.25, they often move in opposite directions. FXB charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ACLO.

Performance

FXB vs. ACLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco CurrencyShares® British Pound Sterling Trust (FXB) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXB achieves a -1.17% return, which is significantly lower than ACLO's 2.44% return.

FXB

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: -1.63%
• YTD: -1.17%
• 6M: -1.24%
• 1Y: -0.33%
• 3Y*: 4.05%
• 5Y*: 0.79%
• 10Y*: 0.48%

ACLO

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 2.44%
• 6M: 2.55%
• 1Y: 5.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXB vs. ACLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FXB Invesco CurrencyShares® British Pound Sterling Trust	-1.17%	10.37%	-0.30%
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF	2.44%	5.32%	0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FXB and ACLO is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2024	-0.25

Return for Risk

FXB vs. ACLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXB

FXB Risk / Return Rank: 8
FXB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
FXB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
FXB Omega Ratio Rank: 7
FXB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
FXB Martin Ratio Rank: 8

ACLO

ACLO Risk / Return Rank: 99
ACLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXB vs. ACLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CurrencyShares® British Pound Sterling Trust (FXB) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FXB	ACLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.05	7.28	-7.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.03	15.06	-15.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	3.42	-2.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.07	19.77	-19.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.15	164.39	-164.53

FXB vs. ACLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXB Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the ACLO Sharpe Ratio of 7.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXB and ACLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FXB vs. ACLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXB drawdown since its inception was -48.99%, which is greater than ACLO's maximum drawdown of -1.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXB and ACLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FXB	ACLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.99%	-1.01%	-47.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.53%	-0.27%	-4.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.44%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.64%	0.00%	-30.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.54%	-0.04%	-27.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.25%	0.03%	+2.22%

Volatility

FXB vs. ACLO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco CurrencyShares® British Pound Sterling Trust (FXB) has a higher volatility of 1.62% compared to TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) at 0.19%. This indicates that FXB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FXB	ACLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.62%	0.19%	+1.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.90%	0.58%	+4.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.57%	0.73%	+5.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.48%	1.07%	+7.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.87%	1.07%	+7.80%

FXB vs. ACLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXB has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ACLO's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

FXB vs. ACLO - Dividend Comparison

FXB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, less than ACLO's 4.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF	4.90%	4.87%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%
FXB Invesco CurrencyShares® British Pound Sterling Trust	2.24%	2.44%	3.25%	2.59%	0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FXB and ACLO in my portfolio?

FXB and ACLO have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FXB or ACLO?

FXB has higher volatility (1.62%) compared to ACLO (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXB dropped -48.99% vs ACLO's -1.01%.

Which ETF is better, FXB or ACLO?

On 1-year performance, ACLO leads with 5.27% vs -0.33% for FXB. On fees, ACLO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ACLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FXB or ACLO?

Over the 1-year period, ACLO has performed better with a 5.27% return vs -0.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FXB or ACLO?

ACLO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FXB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FXB or ACLO?

ACLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 2.24% for FXB.

What is the main difference between FXB and ACLO?

FXB is categorized as Currency, while ACLO is CLO. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FXB and 0.20% for ACLO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.28 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.