PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXAIX vs. FLCNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXAIX vs. FLCNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) and Fidelity Contrafund K6 (FLCNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXAIX achieves a 10.89% return, which is significantly higher than FLCNX's 8.11% return.


FXAIX

1D
-0.73%
1M
4.17%
YTD
10.89%
6M
10.80%
1Y
28.02%
3Y*
22.45%
5Y*
13.91%
10Y*
15.58%

FLCNX

1D
0.33%
1M
3.99%
YTD
8.11%
6M
9.30%
1Y
23.19%
3Y*
27.06%
5Y*
15.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXAIX vs. FLCNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
10.89%17.84%25.01%26.29%-18.14%28.71%18.42%31.48%-4.43%12.01%
FLCNX
Fidelity Contrafund K6
8.11%22.05%35.37%37.67%-27.13%24.21%30.85%30.91%-2.16%13.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FXAIX and FLCNX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2017

0.92

The correlation between FXAIX and FLCNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXAIX vs. FLCNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXAIX
FXAIX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FXAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FXAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCNX
FLCNX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FLCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXAIX vs. FLCNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) and Fidelity Contrafund K6 (FLCNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXAIXFLCNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.30

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

2.07

+1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.80

8.55

+6.25

FXAIX vs. FLCNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXAIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the FLCNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXAIX and FLCNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXAIXFLCNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

1.69

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.80

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.86

-0.04

Drawdowns

FXAIX vs. FLCNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXAIX drawdown since its inception was -33.79%, which is greater than FLCNX's maximum drawdown of -32.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXAIX and FLCNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXAIXFLCNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.79%

-32.07%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-11.73%

+2.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

-20.14%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.50%

-32.07%

+7.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-0.11%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.79%

-6.65%

+2.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

2.82%

-0.92%

Volatility

FXAIX vs. FLCNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) is 2.92%, while Fidelity Contrafund K6 (FLCNX) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that FXAIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXAIXFLCNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

3.33%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.99%

10.69%

-1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.88%

14.31%

-2.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.91%

19.07%

-2.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.07%

20.40%

-2.33%

FXAIX vs. FLCNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXAIX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than FLCNX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXAIX vs. FLCNX - Dividend Comparison

FXAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than FLCNX's 10.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLCNX
Fidelity Contrafund K6
10.62%8.35%0.36%0.49%1.18%0.46%0.21%0.30%0.33%0.15%0.00%0.00%
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
1.03%1.11%1.25%1.45%1.69%1.22%1.60%2.06%2.72%1.97%2.52%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXAIX and FLCNX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLCNX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to FXAIX (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXAIX dropped -33.79% vs FLCNX's -32.07%.

FXAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXAIX and FLCNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer