PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXAIX vs. CASH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXAIX vs. CASH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) and Meta Financial Group, Inc. (CASH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXAIX achieves a 9.14% return, which is significantly lower than CASH's 15.67% return. Over the past 10 years, FXAIX has underperformed CASH with an annualized return of 15.52%, while CASH has yielded a comparatively higher 17.45% annualized return.


FXAIX

1D
0.51%
1M
0.42%
YTD
9.14%
6M
9.65%
1Y
25.82%
3Y*
20.99%
5Y*
13.45%
10Y*
15.52%

CASH

1D
-2.54%
1M
2.73%
YTD
15.67%
6M
11.54%
1Y
10.58%
3Y*
19.67%
5Y*
9.35%
10Y*
17.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXAIX vs. CASH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
9.14%17.84%25.01%26.29%-18.14%28.71%18.42%31.48%-4.43%21.82%
CASH
Meta Financial Group, Inc.
15.67%-3.25%39.47%23.45%-27.48%63.82%0.94%89.68%-36.81%-9.39%

Correlation

The correlation between FXAIX and CASH is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2011

0.40

The correlation between FXAIX and CASH shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXAIX vs. CASH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXAIX
FXAIX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FXAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FXAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

CASH
CASH Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
CASH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CASH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
CASH Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
CASH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
CASH Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXAIX vs. CASH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) and Meta Financial Group, Inc. (CASH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXAIXCASHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.09

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

0.48

+2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.52

0.95

+11.56

FXAIX vs. CASH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXAIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the CASH Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXAIX and CASH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXAIX vs. CASH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXAIX drawdown since its inception was -33.79%, smaller than the maximum CASH drawdown of -83.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXAIX and CASH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXAIXCASHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.79%

-83.66%

+49.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-22.21%

+13.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

-25.20%

+6.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.50%

-50.84%

+26.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.79%

-64.90%

+31.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.29%

-17.86%

+15.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.79%

-22.88%

+19.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

11.12%

-9.16%

Volatility

FXAIX vs. CASH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) is 4.43%, while Meta Financial Group, Inc. (CASH) has a volatility of 7.63%. This indicates that FXAIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CASH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXAIXCASHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

7.63%

-3.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.69%

22.75%

-13.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.37%

28.84%

-16.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.98%

33.64%

-16.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.10%

41.31%

-23.21%

Dividends

FXAIX vs. CASH - Dividend Comparison

FXAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than CASH's 0.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CASH
Meta Financial Group, Inc.
0.24%0.28%0.27%0.38%0.46%0.34%0.55%0.55%0.96%0.56%0.51%1.13%
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
1.05%1.11%1.25%1.45%1.69%1.22%1.60%2.06%2.72%1.97%2.52%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXAIX and CASH have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CASH has higher volatility (7.63%) compared to FXAIX (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXAIX dropped -33.79% vs CASH's -83.66%.

FXAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXAIX and CASH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer