PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXA vs. UDN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXA vs. UDN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco CurrencyShares Australian Dollar Trust (FXA) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bearish Fund (UDN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXA achieves a 7.28% return, which is significantly higher than UDN's -0.60% return. Over the past 10 years, FXA has outperformed UDN with an annualized return of 0.27%, while UDN has yielded a comparatively lower -0.48% annualized return.


FXA

1D
-0.71%
1M
-0.48%
YTD
7.28%
6M
8.49%
1Y
11.38%
3Y*
3.89%
5Y*
-0.88%
10Y*
0.27%

UDN

1D
-0.33%
1M
-0.98%
YTD
-0.60%
6M
0.02%
1Y
1.27%
3Y*
3.62%
5Y*
-0.78%
10Y*
-0.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXA vs. UDN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXA
Invesco CurrencyShares Australian Dollar Trust
7.28%9.10%-7.75%1.20%-6.46%-6.17%9.52%0.13%-8.84%9.05%
UDN
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bearish Fund
-0.60%12.37%-4.53%4.88%-7.96%-7.03%6.20%-0.97%-5.02%9.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FXA and UDN is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2007

0.61

The correlation between FXA and UDN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXA vs. UDN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXA
FXA Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
FXA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXA Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FXA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXA Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

UDN
UDN Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
UDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDN Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
UDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDN Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXA vs. UDN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CurrencyShares Australian Dollar Trust (FXA) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bearish Fund (UDN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXAUDNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.04

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

0.28

+2.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.85

0.60

+7.24

FXA vs. UDN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXA Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the UDN Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXA and UDN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXAUDNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

0.21

+1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

-0.11

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

-0.07

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

-0.09

+0.23

Drawdowns

FXA vs. UDN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXA drawdown since its inception was -40.97%, roughly equal to the maximum UDN drawdown of -41.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXA and UDN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXAUDNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.97%

-41.67%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.21%

-4.54%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.02%

-8.59%

-4.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.05%

-22.50%

+1.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.99%

-25.72%

-2.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.43%

-27.70%

+3.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.82%

-20.61%

+1.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.45%

2.11%

-0.66%

Volatility

FXA vs. UDN - Volatility Comparison

Invesco CurrencyShares Australian Dollar Trust (FXA) has a higher volatility of 2.25% compared to Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bearish Fund (UDN) at 1.27%. This indicates that FXA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UDN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXAUDNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.25%

1.27%

+0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.21%

4.25%

+1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.96%

6.09%

+1.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.41%

7.41%

+3.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.90%

6.92%

+2.98%

FXA vs. UDN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXA has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than UDN's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXA vs. UDN - Dividend Comparison

FXA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than UDN's 2.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXA
Invesco CurrencyShares Australian Dollar Trust
0.95%1.16%1.66%0.98%0.05%0.00%0.03%0.53%1.04%0.83%1.01%1.52%
UDN
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bearish Fund
2.95%2.94%5.33%5.21%0.69%0.00%0.00%1.38%1.26%0.11%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXA and UDN have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXA has higher volatility (2.25%) compared to UDN (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXA dropped -40.97% vs UDN's -41.67%.

On 10-year performance, FXA leads with 0.27% vs -0.48% for UDN. On fees, FXA is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, UDN has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FXA has performed better with a 0.27% return vs -0.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FXA is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for UDN.

UDN has the higher dividend yield at 2.95%, compared with 0.95% for FXA.

FXA tracks USD/AUD Exchange Rate, while UDN tracks Deutsche Bank Short USD Currency Portfolio Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FXA and 0.77% for UDN.

FXA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXA and UDN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer