FWRA.L vs. WNRG.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

FWRA.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation) and WNRG.L (State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds - FWRA.L tracks the FTSE All-World Index while WNRG.L tracks the MSCI World Energy 35/20 Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FWRA.L returned 18.35%/yr vs 16.24%/yr for WNRG.L. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FWRA.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for WNRG.L.

Performance

FWRA.L vs. WNRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FWRA.L achieves a 9.39% return, which is significantly lower than WNRG.L's 27.75% return.

FWRA.L

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: -2.13%
• 6M: 7.35%
• YTD: 9.39%
• 1Y: 21.05%
• 3Y*: 18.35%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WNRG.L

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 4.49%
• 6M: 21.77%
• YTD: 27.75%
• 1Y: 37.39%
• 3Y*: 16.24%
• 5Y*: 20.55%
• 10Y*: 8.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWRA.L vs. WNRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FWRA.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation	9.39%	22.42%	18.04%	10.02%
WNRG.L State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	27.75%	14.83%	2.07%	11.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FWRA.L and WNRG.L is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023	0.21

The correlation between FWRA.L and WNRG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FWRA.L vs. WNRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWRA.L

FWRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 65
FWRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
FWRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FWRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FWRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
FWRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 68

WNRG.L

WNRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 66
WNRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
WNRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
WNRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 71
WNRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
WNRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWRA.L vs. WNRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FWRA.L	WNRG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	1.81	-0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.46	2.32	+0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.31	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.40	2.33	+0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.53	6.70	+2.84

FWRA.L vs. WNRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWRA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the WNRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWRA.L and WNRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FWRA.L vs. WNRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWRA.L drawdown since its inception was -16.50%, smaller than the maximum WNRG.L drawdown of -68.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWRA.L and WNRG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FWRA.L	WNRG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.50%	-68.72%	+52.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.78%	-15.98%	+7.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.50%	-18.94%	+2.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.55%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-63.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.65%	-8.18%	+5.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.92%	-17.54%	+15.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.21%	5.57%	-3.36%

Volatility

FWRA.L vs. WNRG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) is 3.46%, while State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNRG.L) has a volatility of 5.93%. This indicates that FWRA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FWRA.L	WNRG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.46%	5.93%	-2.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.67%	17.83%	-7.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.95%	20.62%	-7.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.61%	24.34%	-10.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.61%	33.35%	-19.74%

FWRA.L vs. WNRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWRA.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than WNRG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

FWRA.L vs. WNRG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FWRA.L nor WNRG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FWRA.L and WNRG.L in my portfolio?

FWRA.L and WNRG.L have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FWRA.L or WNRG.L?

On fees, FWRA.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FWRA.L or WNRG.L?

FWRA.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WNRG.L.

What is the main difference between FWRA.L and WNRG.L?

FWRA.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while WNRG.L tracks MSCI World Energy 35/20 Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FWRA.L and 0.30% for WNRG.L.