FWRA.L vs. TIGB.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FWRA.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation) and TIGB.L (Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - FWRA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index, while TIGB.L is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Coupons Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FWRA.L returned 28.82% vs 2.79% for TIGB.L. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FWRA.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for TIGB.L.

Performance

FWRA.L vs. TIGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist (TIGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

FWRA.L is traded in USD, while TIGB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the TIGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FWRA.L achieves a 11.59% return, which is significantly higher than TIGB.L's 1.17% return.

FWRA.L

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 4.28%
• YTD: 11.59%
• 6M: 13.01%
• 1Y: 28.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TIGB.L

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: -0.56%
• YTD: 1.17%
• 6M: 2.50%
• 1Y: 2.79%
• 3Y*: 7.17%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWRA.L vs. TIGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FWRA.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation	11.59%	22.37%	18.07%	9.23%
TIGB.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist	1.17%	11.96%	3.19%	3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between FWRA.L and TIGB.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023	0.30

Return for Risk

FWRA.L vs. TIGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWRA.L

FWRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 73
FWRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FWRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FWRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FWRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FWRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 74

TIGB.L

TIGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 97
TIGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
TIGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
TIGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 98
TIGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
TIGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWRA.L vs. TIGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist (TIGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FWRA.L	TIGB.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	0.41	+1.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.44	0.65	+2.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.07	+0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.27	0.66	+2.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.70	1.41	+12.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FWRA.L vs. TIGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWRA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the TIGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWRA.L and TIGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FWRA.L	TIGB.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.32	0.41	+1.91
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.56	0.39	+1.17

Drawdowns

FWRA.L vs. TIGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWRA.L drawdown since its inception was -16.60%, smaller than the maximum TIGB.L drawdown of -21.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWRA.L and TIGB.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FWRA.L	TIGB.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.60%	-21.42%	+4.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.74%	-4.25%	-4.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-8.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.77%	-1.87%	+1.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.93%	-3.79%	+1.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.09%	1.98%	+0.11%

Volatility

FWRA.L vs. TIGB.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) has a higher volatility of 3.80% compared to Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist (TIGB.L) at 1.67%. This indicates that FWRA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FWRA.L	TIGB.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.80%	1.67%	+2.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.86%	4.91%	+4.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.32%	6.76%	+5.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.52%	9.88%	+3.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.52%	9.88%	+3.64%

FWRA.L vs. TIGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWRA.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than TIGB.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FWRA.L vs. TIGB.L - Dividend Comparison

FWRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TIGB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FWRA.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TIGB.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist	3.92%	4.11%	4.93%	4.53%	1.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FWRA.L and TIGB.L in my portfolio?

FWRA.L and TIGB.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FWRA.L or TIGB.L?

On fees, TIGB.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FWRA.L or TIGB.L?

TIGB.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FWRA.L.

What is the main difference between FWRA.L and TIGB.L?

FWRA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while TIGB.L is Short-Term Bond. FWRA.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while TIGB.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Coupons Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FWRA.L and 0.10% for TIGB.L.