FWRA.L vs. SPXS.L
FWRA.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation) and SPXS.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds from Invesco - FWRA.L tracks the FTSE All-World Index while SPXS.L tracks the Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FWRA.L returned 19.09%/yr vs -74.11%/yr for SPXS.L. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FWRA.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPXS.L.
Performance
FWRA.L vs. SPXS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FWRA.L achieves a 11.06% return, which is significantly higher than SPXS.L's 10.20% return.
FWRA.L
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- 6M
- 9.50%
- YTD
- 11.06%
- 1Y
- 23.54%
- 3Y*
- 19.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXS.L
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- 6M
- 9.96%
- YTD
- 10.20%
- 1Y
- -98.78%
- 3Y*
- -74.11%
- 5Y*
- -54.94%
- 10Y*
- -27.39%
FWRA.L vs. SPXS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FWRA.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation | 11.06% | 22.42% | 18.04% | 10.02% |
SPXS.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.20% | -98.82% | 25.56% | 10.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between FWRA.L and SPXS.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023 | 0.92 |
The correlation between FWRA.L and SPXS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FWRA.L vs. SPXS.L — Risk / Return Rank
FWRA.L
SPXS.L
FWRA.L vs. SPXS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FWRA.L | SPXS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 0.52 | +0.82 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | -1.00 | +3.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.70 | -1.23 | +11.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FWRA.L vs. SPXS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FWRA.L drawdown since its inception was -16.50%, smaller than the maximum SPXS.L drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWRA.L and SPXS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FWRA.L | SPXS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.50% | -99.07% | +82.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.78% | -99.07% | +90.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.50% | -99.07% | +82.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -99.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | -98.90% | +97.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.92% | -7.67% | +5.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 80.57% | -78.37% |
Volatility
FWRA.L vs. SPXS.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) has a higher volatility of 3.20% compared to Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.L) at 2.73%. This indicates that FWRA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FWRA.L | SPXS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.20% | 2.73% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.60% | 9.24% | +1.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.88% | 99.43% | -86.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.61% | 47.13% | -33.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.61% | 35.27% | -21.66% |
FWRA.L vs. SPXS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FWRA.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXS.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FWRA.L vs. SPXS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FWRA.L nor SPXS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, FWRA.L and SPXS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SPXS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FWRA.L.
FWRA.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while SPXS.L tracks Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FWRA.L and 0.05% for SPXS.L.
Find the right allocation for FWRA.L and SPXS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer