FWOMX vs. TANDX
FWOMX (Fidelity Women's Leadership Fund) and TANDX (Castle Tandem Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FWOMX returned 8.58%/yr vs 1.61%/yr for TANDX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FWOMX charges 0.90%/yr vs 1.59%/yr for TANDX.
Performance
FWOMX vs. TANDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FWOMX achieves a 14.49% return, which is significantly higher than TANDX's -11.33% return.
FWOMX
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -1.22%
- 6M
- 14.49%
- YTD
- 14.49%
- 1Y
- 26.21%
- 3Y*
- 17.56%
- 5Y*
- 8.58%
- 10Y*
- —
TANDX
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 2.13%
- 6M
- -11.33%
- YTD
- -11.33%
- 1Y
- -13.85%
- 3Y*
- 0.97%
- 5Y*
- 1.61%
- 10Y*
- —
FWOMX vs. TANDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWOMX Fidelity Women's Leadership Fund | 14.49% | 16.20% | 13.70% | 21.12% | -19.82% | 19.42% | 25.30% | 11.06% |
TANDX Castle Tandem Fund | -11.33% | 3.67% | 7.66% | 8.42% | -7.87% | 19.03% | 13.39% | 9.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between FWOMX and TANDX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2019 | 0.73 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FWOMX and TANDX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FWOMX vs. TANDX — Risk / Return Rank
FWOMX
TANDX
FWOMX vs. TANDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Women's Leadership Fund (FWOMX) and Castle Tandem Fund (TANDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FWOMX | TANDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 0.78 | +0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | -0.85 | +3.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.28 | -1.75 | +13.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FWOMX vs. TANDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FWOMX drawdown since its inception was -36.47%, smaller than the maximum TANDX drawdown of -93.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWOMX and TANDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FWOMX | TANDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.47% | -93.98% | +57.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.74% | -16.90% | +6.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.53% | -93.98% | +72.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.05% | -93.98% | +63.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -93.80% | +92.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.33% | -21.05% | +13.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 8.13% | -5.72% |
Volatility
FWOMX vs. TANDX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Women's Leadership Fund (FWOMX) has a higher volatility of 5.74% compared to Castle Tandem Fund (TANDX) at 3.92%. This indicates that FWOMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TANDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FWOMX | TANDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.74% | 3.92% | +1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.54% | 7.88% | +3.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.39% | 9.75% | +4.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 596.04% | -578.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.57% | 493.82% | -473.25% |
FWOMX vs. TANDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FWOMX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than TANDX's 1.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
FWOMX vs. TANDX - Dividend Comparison
FWOMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, less than TANDX's 6.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWOMX Fidelity Women's Leadership Fund | 2.61% | 3.19% | 1.89% | 0.57% | 0.62% | 2.65% | 0.21% | 0.27% |
TANDX Castle Tandem Fund | 6.96% | 6.17% | 3.71% | 2.10% | 1.48% | 4.57% | 0.33% | 0.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FWOMX and TANDX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FWOMX has higher volatility (5.74%) compared to TANDX (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FWOMX dropped -36.47% vs TANDX's -93.98%.
FWOMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs -1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FWOMX and TANDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer