FWOAX vs. RCKSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FWOAX (Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership Fund Class A) and RCKSX (Rock Oak Core Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FWOAX returned 9.77%/yr vs 7.42%/yr for RCKSX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FWOAX charges 1.10%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for RCKSX.

Performance

FWOAX vs. RCKSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership Fund Class A (FWOAX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FWOAX achieves a 15.82% return, which is significantly higher than RCKSX's 14.10% return.

FWOAX

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 7.54%
• YTD: 15.82%
• 6M: 16.26%
• 1Y: 37.22%
• 3Y*: 19.34%
• 5Y*: 9.77%
• 10Y*: —

RCKSX

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 1.87%
• YTD: 14.10%
• 6M: 14.42%
• 1Y: 20.18%
• 3Y*: 19.62%
• 5Y*: 7.42%
• 10Y*: 10.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWOAX vs. RCKSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FWOAX Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership Fund Class A	15.82%	18.75%	11.61%	20.82%	-20.01%	19.22%	25.02%	10.95%
RCKSX Rock Oak Core Growth Fund	14.10%	12.99%	15.12%	15.57%	-18.09%	9.96%	13.75%	10.96%

Correlation

The correlation between FWOAX and RCKSX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2019	0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between FWOAX and RCKSX has dropped to 0.64 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FWOAX vs. RCKSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWOAX

FWOAX Risk / Return Rank: 84
FWOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
FWOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
FWOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FWOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FWOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

RCKSX

RCKSX Risk / Return Rank: 56
RCKSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
RCKSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
RCKSX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
RCKSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
RCKSX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWOAX vs. RCKSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership Fund Class A (FWOAX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FWOAX	RCKSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.89	1.83	+1.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.92	2.66	+1.27
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.31	+0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.72	5.11	-1.39
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	18.23	14.18	+4.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FWOAX vs. RCKSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWOAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is higher than the RCKSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWOAX and RCKSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FWOAX	RCKSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.89	1.83	+1.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	0.48	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.62	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	0.38	+0.29

Drawdowns

FWOAX vs. RCKSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWOAX drawdown since its inception was -36.50%, smaller than the maximum RCKSX drawdown of -57.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWOAX and RCKSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FWOAX	RCKSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.50%	-57.88%	+21.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.29%	-4.14%	-6.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.81%	-18.22%	-4.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.17%	-22.54%	-7.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.60%	+0.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.55%	-9.51%	+1.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.10%	1.49%	+0.61%

Volatility

FWOAX vs. RCKSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership Fund Class A (FWOAX) has a higher volatility of 3.85% compared to Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX) at 2.94%. This indicates that FWOAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RCKSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FWOAX	RCKSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.85%	2.94%	+0.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.46%	8.06%	+2.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.25%	11.56%	+1.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.79%	15.66%	+2.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.56%	17.55%	+3.01%

FWOAX vs. RCKSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWOAX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than RCKSX's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

FWOAX vs. RCKSX - Dividend Comparison

FWOAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%, less than RCKSX's 5.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FWOAX Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership Fund Class A	4.74%	5.49%	0.00%	0.41%	0.50%	2.53%	0.06%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RCKSX Rock Oak Core Growth Fund	5.48%	6.26%	0.47%	0.71%	1.00%	4.31%	16.56%	3.18%	0.59%	5.91%	0.70%	3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FWOAX and RCKSX in my portfolio?

FWOAX and RCKSX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FWOAX or RCKSX?

FWOAX has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to RCKSX (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FWOAX dropped -36.50% vs RCKSX's -57.88%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FWOAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.