PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FWLSX vs. URSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FWLSX vs. URSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund (FWLSX) and USAA Target Retirement 2060 Fund (URSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FWLSX having a 12.62% return and URSIX slightly higher at 12.78%.


FWLSX

1D
-1.36%
1M
-0.12%
6M
9.29%
YTD
12.62%
1Y
24.15%
3Y*
19.69%
5Y*
10.78%
10Y*

URSIX

1D
-0.78%
1M
0.34%
6M
9.78%
YTD
12.78%
1Y
23.03%
3Y*
17.19%
5Y*
9.65%
10Y*
10.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWLSX vs. URSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FWLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund
12.62%22.76%17.95%21.00%-18.55%16.88%18.48%25.96%-8.33%10.11%
URSIX
USAA Target Retirement 2060 Fund
12.78%19.62%13.05%18.22%-15.78%17.70%10.17%20.09%-9.17%8.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FWLSX and URSIX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.97

The correlation between FWLSX and URSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FWLSX vs. URSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWLSX
FWLSX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FWLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FWLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

URSIX
URSIX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
URSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
URSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
URSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
URSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWLSX vs. URSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund (FWLSX) and USAA Target Retirement 2060 Fund (URSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FWLSXURSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.34

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

2.81

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.07

12.06

-0.98

FWLSX vs. URSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWLSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the URSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWLSX and URSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FWLSX vs. URSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWLSX drawdown since its inception was -31.32%, roughly equal to the maximum URSIX drawdown of -30.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWLSX and URSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FWLSXURSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.32%

-30.33%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.49%

-8.32%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.38%

-14.35%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.40%

-23.85%

-3.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.94%

-0.95%

-0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

-4.42%

-0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

1.93%

+0.28%

Volatility

FWLSX vs. URSIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund (FWLSX) has a higher volatility of 5.24% compared to USAA Target Retirement 2060 Fund (URSIX) at 4.23%. This indicates that FWLSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FWLSXURSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

4.23%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.86%

10.29%

+1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.87%

12.35%

+1.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.32%

14.22%

+1.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.10%

14.51%

+1.59%

FWLSX vs. URSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWLSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than URSIX's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FWLSX vs. URSIX - Dividend Comparison

FWLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, less than URSIX's 4.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FWLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund
4.07%3.14%7.07%2.36%5.59%9.05%5.80%7.02%8.16%3.09%0.00%0.00%
URSIX
USAA Target Retirement 2060 Fund
4.96%5.60%2.55%2.89%10.97%7.07%4.79%5.88%4.77%3.82%3.01%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, FWLSX and URSIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FWLSX has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to URSIX (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FWLSX dropped -31.32% vs URSIX's -30.33%.

URSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FWLSX and URSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer