FWIA.DE vs. CSY9.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FWIA.DE (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc) and CSY9.DE (CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD) are both Global Equities funds - FWIA.DE tracks the FTSE All-World while CSY9.DE tracks the MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FWIA.DE returned 26.39% vs 3.39% for CSY9.DE. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FWIA.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CSY9.DE.

Performance

FWIA.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWIA.DE) and CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FWIA.DE achieves a 12.60% return, which is significantly higher than CSY9.DE's 3.19% return.

FWIA.DE

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 3.67%
• YTD: 12.60%
• 6M: 12.82%
• 1Y: 26.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSY9.DE

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 2.71%
• YTD: 3.19%
• 6M: 3.19%
• 1Y: 3.39%
• 3Y*: 6.65%
• 5Y*: 6.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWIA.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FWIA.DE Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc	12.60%	9.02%	24.70%	7.73%
CSY9.DE CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD	3.19%	-0.67%	16.05%	3.56%

Correlation

The correlation between FWIA.DE and CSY9.DE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023	0.59

The correlation between FWIA.DE and CSY9.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FWIA.DE vs. CSY9.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWIA.DE

FWIA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 77
FWIA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FWIA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FWIA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 76
FWIA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FWIA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 83

CSY9.DE

CSY9.DE Risk / Return Rank: 15
CSY9.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
CSY9.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
CSY9.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 14
CSY9.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
CSY9.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWIA.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWIA.DE) and CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FWIA.DE	CSY9.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	0.38	+1.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.31	0.58	+2.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.07	+0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.08	0.69	+3.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.52	1.54	+14.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FWIA.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWIA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the CSY9.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWIA.DE and CSY9.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FWIA.DE	CSY9.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.36	0.38	+1.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.40	0.61	+0.80

Drawdowns

FWIA.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWIA.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.96%, which is greater than CSY9.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWIA.DE and CSY9.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	FWIA.DE	CSY9.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.96%	-13.92%	-7.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.49%	-4.48%	-2.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.92%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.62%	-2.72%	+2.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.44%	-3.70%	+1.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.60%	2.00%	-0.40%

Volatility

FWIA.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWIA.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.96% compared to CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE) at 2.09%. This indicates that FWIA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSY9.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FWIA.DE	CSY9.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.96%	2.09%	+0.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.09%	5.48%	+2.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.22%	8.07%	+3.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.18%	12.03%	+1.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.18%	11.91%	+1.27%

FWIA.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWIA.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CSY9.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FWIA.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither FWIA.DE nor CSY9.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FWIA.DE and CSY9.DE in my portfolio?

FWIA.DE and CSY9.DE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FWIA.DE or CSY9.DE?

On fees, FWIA.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FWIA.DE or CSY9.DE?

FWIA.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CSY9.DE.

What is the main difference between FWIA.DE and CSY9.DE?

FWIA.DE tracks FTSE All-World, while CSY9.DE tracks MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Credit Suisse. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FWIA.DE and 0.25% for CSY9.DE.