PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FWIA.DE vs. CBUY.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FWIA.DE vs. CBUY.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWIA.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI SRI UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUY.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FWIA.DE having a 12.60% return and CBUY.DE slightly lower at 12.08%.


FWIA.DE

1D
-0.22%
1M
3.67%
YTD
12.60%
6M
12.82%
1Y
26.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CBUY.DE

1D
0.15%
1M
3.34%
YTD
12.08%
6M
12.79%
1Y
21.71%
3Y*
13.96%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWIA.DE vs. CBUY.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FWIA.DE
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc
12.60%9.02%24.70%7.73%
CBUY.DE
iShares MSCI ACWI SRI UCITS ETF USD Acc
12.08%4.79%18.71%5.56%

Correlation

The correlation between FWIA.DE and CBUY.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023

0.93

The correlation between FWIA.DE and CBUY.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FWIA.DE vs. CBUY.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWIA.DE
FWIA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FWIA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWIA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWIA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FWIA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWIA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

CBUY.DE
CBUY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
CBUY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWIA.DE vs. CBUY.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWIA.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI SRI UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUY.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FWIA.DECBUY.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.31

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.08

2.88

+1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.52

10.71

+5.80

FWIA.DE vs. CBUY.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWIA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the CBUY.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWIA.DE and CBUY.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FWIA.DECBUY.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

1.70

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.40

1.17

+0.24

Drawdowns

FWIA.DE vs. CBUY.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWIA.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.96%, roughly equal to the maximum CBUY.DE drawdown of -21.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWIA.DE and CBUY.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FWIA.DECBUY.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.96%

-21.18%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.49%

-7.49%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-0.05%

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.44%

-2.75%

+0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

2.02%

-0.42%

Volatility

FWIA.DE vs. CBUY.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWIA.DE) is 2.96%, while iShares MSCI ACWI SRI UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUY.DE) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that FWIA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBUY.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FWIA.DECBUY.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

3.83%

-0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.09%

9.45%

-1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.22%

12.66%

-1.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.18%

13.42%

-0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.18%

13.42%

-0.24%

FWIA.DE vs. CBUY.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWIA.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CBUY.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FWIA.DE vs. CBUY.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither FWIA.DE nor CBUY.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FWIA.DE and CBUY.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, FWIA.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FWIA.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CBUY.DE.

FWIA.DE tracks FTSE All-World, while CBUY.DE tracks MSCI ACWI SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FWIA.DE and 0.20% for CBUY.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FWIA.DE and CBUY.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer