PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVUG.L vs. SDIG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FVUG.L vs. SDIG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (FVUG.L) and iShares $ Short Duration Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SDIG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FVUG.L is traded in GBP, while SDIG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SDIG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVUG.L achieves a -2.28% return, which is significantly lower than SDIG.L's 0.64% return.


FVUG.L

1D
-0.71%
1M
-2.23%
6M
-2.05%
YTD
-2.28%
1Y
-0.85%
3Y*
2.92%
5Y*
-2.41%
10Y*

SDIG.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.73%
6M
0.38%
YTD
0.64%
1Y
2.94%
3Y*
4.05%
5Y*
2.82%
10Y*
2.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVUG.L vs. SDIG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FVUG.L
Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
-2.28%5.85%-1.90%5.64%-14.50%-9.35%11.32%-12.00%
SDIG.L
iShares $ Short Duration Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.64%-1.44%6.77%0.54%6.49%0.47%1.44%0.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FVUG.L and SDIG.L is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2019

0.37

The correlation between FVUG.L and SDIG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVUG.L vs. SDIG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVUG.L
FVUG.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FVUG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVUG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVUG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FVUG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVUG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

SDIG.L
SDIG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SDIG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDIG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDIG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SDIG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDIG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVUG.L vs. SDIG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (FVUG.L) and iShares $ Short Duration Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SDIG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FVUG.LSDIG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.09

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.20

0.62

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.45

1.71

-2.17

FVUG.L vs. SDIG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVUG.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the SDIG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVUG.L and SDIG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FVUG.L vs. SDIG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVUG.L drawdown since its inception was -27.48%, which is greater than SDIG.L's maximum drawdown of -15.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVUG.L and SDIG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVUG.LSDIG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.48%

-15.38%

-12.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.35%

-5.04%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.06%

-8.73%

+3.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.03%

-15.38%

-6.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.75%

-4.49%

-14.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.96%

-5.71%

-10.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

1.82%

+0.06%

Volatility

FVUG.L vs. SDIG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (FVUG.L) is 1.38%, while iShares $ Short Duration Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SDIG.L) has a volatility of 1.52%. This indicates that FVUG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SDIG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVUG.LSDIG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.38%

1.52%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.87%

5.01%

-1.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.96%

6.45%

-1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.81%

8.07%

-1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.04%

8.90%

+0.14%

FVUG.L vs. SDIG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVUG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SDIG.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FVUG.L vs. SDIG.L - Dividend Comparison

FVUG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SDIG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FVUG.L
Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SDIG.L
iShares $ Short Duration Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.40%4.32%4.03%3.11%1.85%1.49%2.12%2.63%2.29%1.84%1.75%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


FVUG.L and SDIG.L have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SDIG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SDIG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FVUG.L.

FVUG.L tracks Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc), while SDIG.L tracks iShares $ Short Duration Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist). They also come from different issuers: Franklin and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FVUG.L and 0.20% for SDIG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVUG.L and SDIG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer