PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVUG.L vs. JMBA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FVUG.L vs. JMBA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (FVUG.L) and JPMorgan ETFs (Ireland) ICAV - USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JMBA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FVUG.L is traded in GBP, while JMBA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the JMBA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVUG.L achieves a -2.28% return, which is significantly lower than JMBA.L's 1.18% return.


FVUG.L

1D
-0.71%
1M
-2.23%
6M
-2.05%
YTD
-2.28%
1Y
-0.85%
3Y*
2.92%
5Y*
-2.41%
10Y*

JMBA.L

1D
-1.01%
1M
-1.73%
6M
1.34%
YTD
1.18%
1Y
8.32%
3Y*
6.06%
5Y*
1.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVUG.L vs. JMBA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FVUG.L
Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
-2.28%5.85%-1.90%5.64%-14.50%-9.35%11.32%-0.77%
JMBA.L
JPMorgan ETFs (Ireland) ICAV - USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF USD (acc)
1.18%5.19%3.79%4.04%-6.16%-1.52%2.27%1.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FVUG.L and JMBA.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2019

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVUG.L vs. JMBA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVUG.L
FVUG.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FVUG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVUG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVUG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FVUG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVUG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

JMBA.L
JMBA.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
JMBA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMBA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMBA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
JMBA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMBA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVUG.L vs. JMBA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (FVUG.L) and JPMorgan ETFs (Ireland) ICAV - USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JMBA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FVUG.LJMBA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.20

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.20

1.70

-1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.45

4.70

-5.15

FVUG.L vs. JMBA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVUG.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the JMBA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVUG.L and JMBA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FVUG.L vs. JMBA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVUG.L drawdown since its inception was -27.48%, which is greater than JMBA.L's maximum drawdown of -17.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVUG.L and JMBA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVUG.LJMBA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.48%

-17.56%

-9.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.35%

-4.88%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.06%

-8.79%

+3.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.03%

-14.06%

-7.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.75%

-3.18%

-15.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.96%

-6.67%

-9.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

1.77%

+0.11%

Volatility

FVUG.L vs. JMBA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (FVUG.L) is 1.38%, while JPMorgan ETFs (Ireland) ICAV - USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JMBA.L) has a volatility of 2.12%. This indicates that FVUG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JMBA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVUG.LJMBA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.38%

2.12%

-0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.87%

5.95%

-2.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.96%

7.23%

-2.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.81%

9.33%

-2.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.04%

10.99%

-1.95%

FVUG.L vs. JMBA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVUG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than JMBA.L's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FVUG.L vs. JMBA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FVUG.L nor JMBA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FVUG.L and JMBA.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FVUG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FVUG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for JMBA.L.

FVUG.L tracks Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc), while JMBA.L tracks JPMorgan ETFs (Ireland) ICAV - USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF USD (acc). They also come from different issuers: Franklin and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FVUG.L and 0.39% for JMBA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVUG.L and JMBA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer