PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVUB.L vs. AMES.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FVUB.L vs. AMES.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF (FVUB.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FVUB.L is traded in GBP, while AMES.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the AMES.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVUB.L achieves a 14.58% return, which is significantly higher than AMES.DE's 6.16% return.


FVUB.L

1D
-0.62%
1M
-9.72%
YTD
14.58%
6M
9.14%
1Y
36.63%
3Y*
10.68%
5Y*
7.06%
10Y*

AMES.DE

1D
0.64%
1M
3.83%
YTD
6.16%
6M
9.75%
1Y
37.60%
3Y*
30.03%
5Y*
19.38%
10Y*
12.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVUB.L vs. AMES.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FVUB.L
Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF
14.58%35.51%-26.77%26.33%23.83%-15.44%-22.19%-14.94%
AMES.DE
Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR
6.16%63.50%13.81%23.47%5.48%-0.59%-7.95%2.93%

Correlation

The correlation between FVUB.L and AMES.DE is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2019

0.33

The correlation between FVUB.L and AMES.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (5 years) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVUB.L vs. AMES.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVUB.L
FVUB.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
FVUB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVUB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVUB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FVUB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVUB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

AMES.DE
AMES.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
AMES.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVUB.L vs. AMES.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF (FVUB.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FVUB.LAMES.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.41

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

3.48

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.35

11.97

-3.62

FVUB.L vs. AMES.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVUB.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the AMES.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVUB.L and AMES.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FVUB.LAMES.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

2.30

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

1.19

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

0.48

-0.49

Drawdowns

FVUB.L vs. AMES.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVUB.L drawdown since its inception was -58.22%, which is greater than AMES.DE's maximum drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVUB.L and AMES.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVUB.LAMES.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.22%

-39.33%

-18.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.83%

-10.75%

-3.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.50%

-10.75%

-16.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.42%

-19.03%

-10.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.83%

-1.13%

-12.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.79%

-10.06%

-17.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

3.13%

+1.25%

Volatility

FVUB.L vs. AMES.DE - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF (FVUB.L) has a higher volatility of 6.25% compared to Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE) at 4.49%. This indicates that FVUB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMES.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVUB.LAMES.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.25%

4.49%

+1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.17%

13.64%

+4.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.79%

16.31%

+5.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.57%

18.47%

+7.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.39%

20.70%

+10.69%

FVUB.L vs. AMES.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVUB.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than AMES.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FVUB.L vs. AMES.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither FVUB.L nor AMES.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FVUB.L and AMES.DE have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FVUB.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FVUB.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AMES.DE.

FVUB.L is categorized as Latin America Equities, while AMES.DE is Europe Equities. FVUB.L tracks MSCI Brazil NR USD, while AMES.DE tracks MSCI Spain. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FVUB.L and 0.25% for AMES.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVUB.L and AMES.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer