PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVLSX vs. PRMYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FVLSX vs. PRMYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2030 Fund (FVLSX) and Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Fund (PRMYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVLSX achieves a 8.90% return, which is significantly higher than PRMYX's 2.35% return.


FVLSX

1D
0.85%
1M
0.00%
6M
6.01%
YTD
8.90%
1Y
16.36%
3Y*
15.34%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.27%

PRMYX

1D
0.46%
1M
-0.17%
6M
2.58%
YTD
2.35%
1Y
5.80%
3Y*
7.70%
5Y*
4.03%
10Y*
3.21%
ALL TIME*
3.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FVLSX vs. PRMYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FVLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2030 Fund
8.90%17.28%13.93%15.85%-17.05%11.73%15.50%22.36%-6.53%8.85%
PRMYX
Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Fund
2.35%8.38%6.31%9.82%-4.22%0.02%1.29%8.54%-5.19%1.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FVLSX and PRMYX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.78

The correlation between FVLSX and PRMYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.93 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVLSX vs. PRMYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FVLSX
FVLSX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FVLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FVLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

PRMYX
PRMYX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PRMYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRMYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRMYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
PRMYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRMYX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FVLSX vs. PRMYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2030 Fund (FVLSX) and Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Fund (PRMYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FVLSXPRMYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.23

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

1.77

+0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.63

7.13

+3.50

FVLSX vs. PRMYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVLSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the PRMYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVLSX and PRMYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FVLSX vs. PRMYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVLSX drawdown since its inception was -24.68%, which is greater than PRMYX's maximum drawdown of -9.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVLSX and PRMYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVLSXPRMYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.68%

-9.74%

-14.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.71%

-3.50%

-3.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.02%

-7.35%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.23%

-9.24%

-14.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-0.57%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.74%

-1.68%

-3.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

0.87%

+0.79%

Volatility

FVLSX vs. PRMYX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2030 Fund (FVLSX) has a higher volatility of 3.03% compared to Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Fund (PRMYX) at 1.55%. This indicates that FVLSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRMYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVLSXPRMYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.03%

1.55%

+1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.40%

3.93%

+4.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.77%

4.87%

+4.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.08%

5.26%

+5.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.80%

4.51%

+7.29%

FVLSX vs. PRMYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVLSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than PRMYX's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FVLSX vs. PRMYX - Dividend Comparison

FVLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.76%, more than PRMYX's 3.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FVLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2030 Fund
9.76%6.71%8.31%2.52%4.48%6.07%5.28%6.80%7.38%2.97%0.00%0.00%
PRMYX
Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Fund
3.41%3.30%3.15%3.62%7.46%2.47%2.17%2.97%1.73%0.55%1.53%3.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FVLSX and PRMYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FVLSX has higher volatility (3.03%) compared to PRMYX (1.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVLSX dropped -24.68% vs PRMYX's -9.74%.

FVLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVLSX and PRMYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer