PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVLSX vs. FFBQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FVLSX vs. FFBQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2030 Fund (FVLSX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFBQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVLSX achieves a 9.40% return, which is significantly lower than FFBQX's 14.03% return.


FVLSX

1D
0.54%
1M
3.68%
YTD
9.40%
6M
10.20%
1Y
21.73%
3Y*
16.30%
5Y*
7.83%
10Y*

FFBQX

1D
0.68%
1M
5.43%
YTD
14.03%
6M
15.51%
1Y
31.26%
3Y*
21.53%
5Y*
10.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVLSX vs. FFBQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FVLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2030 Fund
9.40%17.28%13.93%15.85%-17.05%11.73%15.50%7.70%
FFBQX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6
14.03%22.90%16.84%20.67%-18.86%16.47%18.10%9.13%

Correlation

The correlation between FVLSX and FFBQX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2019

0.97

The correlation between FVLSX and FFBQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVLSX vs. FFBQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVLSX
FVLSX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FVLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FVLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FFBQX
FFBQX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FFBQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFBQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFBQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FFBQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFBQX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVLSX vs. FFBQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2030 Fund (FVLSX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFBQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FVLSXFFBQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.46

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

3.28

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.26

14.54

-0.29

FVLSX vs. FFBQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVLSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the FFBQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVLSX and FFBQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FVLSXFFBQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

2.50

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.73

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.79

+0.02

Drawdowns

FVLSX vs. FFBQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVLSX drawdown since its inception was -24.68%, smaller than the maximum FFBQX drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVLSX and FFBQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVLSXFFBQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.68%

-31.34%

+6.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.71%

-9.67%

+2.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.02%

-15.51%

+5.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.23%

-27.60%

+3.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.80%

-5.97%

+1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

2.17%

-0.62%

Volatility

FVLSX vs. FFBQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2030 Fund (FVLSX) is 3.10%, while Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFBQX) has a volatility of 4.18%. This indicates that FVLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFBQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVLSXFFBQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

4.18%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.15%

10.39%

-3.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.66%

12.67%

-4.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.92%

15.10%

-4.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.79%

17.25%

-5.46%

FVLSX vs. FFBQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVLSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FFBQX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

FVLSX vs. FFBQX - Dividend Comparison

FVLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.72%, more than FFBQX's 3.32% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFBQX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6
3.32%2.58%5.66%2.07%5.40%6.98%3.62%2.96%0.00%0.00%
FVLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2030 Fund
9.72%6.71%8.31%2.52%4.48%6.07%5.28%6.80%7.38%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, FVLSX and FFBQX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFBQX has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to FVLSX (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVLSX dropped -24.68% vs FFBQX's -31.34%.

FVLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVLSX and FFBQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer