PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVITX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FVITX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Government Income Fund Class M (FVITX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVITX achieves a 0.20% return, which is significantly lower than FCNTX's 7.76% return. Over the past 10 years, FVITX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 0.48%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.43% annualized return.


FVITX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.40%
YTD
0.20%
6M
0.09%
1Y
4.45%
3Y*
2.66%
5Y*
-0.80%
10Y*
0.48%

FCNTX

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.65%
YTD
7.76%
6M
10.05%
1Y
23.72%
3Y*
26.93%
5Y*
15.12%
10Y*
17.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVITX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FVITX
Fidelity Advisor Government Income Fund Class M
0.20%6.23%-0.15%3.65%-13.28%-2.53%6.56%5.99%0.41%1.78%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
7.76%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FVITX and FCNTX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2005

-0.18

The correlation between FVITX and FCNTX shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (all time) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVITX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVITX
FVITX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
FVITX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVITX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVITX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
FVITX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVITX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVITX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Government Income Fund Class M (FVITX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FVITXFCNTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.31

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

2.13

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.31

9.04

-4.73

FVITX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVITX Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVITX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FVITXFCNTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

1.72

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

0.79

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

0.89

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.78

-0.31

Drawdowns

FVITX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVITX drawdown since its inception was -20.63%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVITX and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVITXFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.63%

-49.19%

+28.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.99%

-11.30%

+8.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.49%

-19.75%

+13.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.54%

-32.59%

+14.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.63%

-32.59%

+11.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.42%

-0.53%

-7.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.98%

-8.16%

+4.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

2.65%

-1.64%

Volatility

FVITX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Government Income Fund Class M (FVITX) is 1.18%, while Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that FVITX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVITXFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.18%

3.26%

-2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.64%

10.48%

-7.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.78%

14.03%

-10.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.11%

19.15%

-13.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.04%

19.68%

-14.64%

FVITX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVITX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FVITX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FVITX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, less than FCNTX's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.33%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
FVITX
Fidelity Advisor Government Income Fund Class M
3.17%3.07%2.95%2.04%0.89%0.40%2.07%1.81%1.76%1.48%2.34%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


FVITX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCNTX has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to FVITX (1.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVITX dropped -20.63% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

FCNTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVITX and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer