PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVIIX vs. DBLDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FVIIX vs. DBLDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Government Income Fund Class I (FVIIX) and DoubleLine Long Duration Total Return Bond Fund (DBLDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVIIX achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly higher than DBLDX's 0.13% return. Over the past 10 years, FVIIX has outperformed DBLDX with an annualized return of 0.72%, while DBLDX has yielded a comparatively lower -0.81% annualized return.


FVIIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.42%
YTD
0.31%
6M
0.11%
1Y
4.73%
3Y*
2.88%
5Y*
-0.57%
10Y*
0.72%

DBLDX

1D
0.16%
1M
0.92%
YTD
0.13%
6M
-1.11%
1Y
6.46%
3Y*
0.81%
5Y*
-4.73%
10Y*
-0.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVIIX vs. DBLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FVIIX
Fidelity Advisor Government Income Fund Class I
0.31%6.52%0.07%3.80%-13.09%-2.26%6.85%6.27%0.67%2.06%
DBLDX
DoubleLine Long Duration Total Return Bond Fund
0.13%6.25%-4.42%3.79%-29.25%-3.91%14.17%14.19%-0.79%6.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FVIIX and DBLDX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2014

0.92

The correlation between FVIIX and DBLDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVIIX vs. DBLDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVIIX
FVIIX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FVIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FVIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

DBLDX
DBLDX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
DBLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
DBLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVIIX vs. DBLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Government Income Fund Class I (FVIIX) and DoubleLine Long Duration Total Return Bond Fund (DBLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FVIIXDBLDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.23

0.74

+0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.89

1.14

+0.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.13

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

0.86

+0.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.64

2.45

+2.19

FVIIX vs. DBLDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVIIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is higher than the DBLDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVIIX and DBLDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FVIIXDBLDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

0.74

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

-0.36

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

-0.07

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.01

+0.51

Drawdowns

FVIIX vs. DBLDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVIIX drawdown since its inception was -20.08%, smaller than the maximum DBLDX drawdown of -45.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVIIX and DBLDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVIIXDBLDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.08%

-45.96%

+25.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.95%

-7.54%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.43%

-16.52%

+10.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.13%

-40.48%

+22.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.08%

-45.96%

+25.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.18%

-34.44%

+27.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.75%

-17.55%

+13.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

2.64%

-1.64%

Volatility

FVIIX vs. DBLDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Government Income Fund Class I (FVIIX) is 1.18%, while DoubleLine Long Duration Total Return Bond Fund (DBLDX) has a volatility of 2.81%. This indicates that FVIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBLDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVIIXDBLDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.18%

2.81%

-1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.60%

6.13%

-3.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.77%

8.76%

-4.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.07%

13.38%

-7.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.02%

12.27%

-7.25%

FVIIX vs. DBLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVIIX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than DBLDX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FVIIX vs. DBLDX - Dividend Comparison

FVIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, less than DBLDX's 5.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBLDX
DoubleLine Long Duration Total Return Bond Fund
5.40%5.14%4.94%3.35%3.48%2.93%9.77%7.60%3.14%3.36%3.15%3.23%
FVIIX
Fidelity Advisor Government Income Fund Class I
3.44%3.33%3.18%2.29%1.09%0.58%2.35%2.07%2.02%1.75%2.64%2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


FVIIX and DBLDX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBLDX has higher volatility (2.81%) compared to FVIIX (1.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVIIX dropped -20.08% vs DBLDX's -45.96%.

FVIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVIIX and DBLDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer