PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVGLX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FVGLX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class Z6 (FVGLX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVGLX achieves a 12.54% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's 7.76% return.


FVGLX

1D
0.54%
1M
4.76%
YTD
12.54%
6M
14.22%
1Y
28.59%
3Y*
20.17%
5Y*
10.10%
10Y*

FCNTX

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.65%
YTD
7.76%
6M
10.05%
1Y
23.72%
3Y*
26.93%
5Y*
15.12%
10Y*
17.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVGLX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FVGLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class Z6
12.54%23.42%13.93%19.57%-17.91%16.30%17.89%26.94%-8.02%9.42%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
7.76%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%12.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FVGLX and FCNTX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.86

The correlation between FVGLX and FCNTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVGLX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVGLX
FVGLX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FVGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FVGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVGLX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class Z6 (FVGLX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FVGLXFCNTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.31

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

2.13

+0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.08

9.04

+4.04

FVGLX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVGLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVGLX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FVGLXFCNTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

1.72

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.79

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.78

-0.04

Drawdowns

FVGLX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVGLX drawdown since its inception was -31.23%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVGLX and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVGLXFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.23%

-49.19%

+17.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.74%

-11.30%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.07%

-19.75%

+4.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.17%

-32.59%

+5.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.53%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.46%

-8.16%

+2.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

2.65%

-0.43%

Volatility

FVGLX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class Z6 (FVGLX) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) at 3.26%. This indicates that FVGLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVGLXFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

3.26%

+0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.39%

10.48%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.65%

14.03%

-1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.96%

19.15%

-4.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.02%

19.68%

-3.66%

FVGLX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVGLX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FVGLX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FVGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.82%, more than FCNTX's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.33%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
FVGLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class Z6
6.82%6.17%1.91%1.67%11.06%9.69%5.54%7.22%11.92%3.36%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FVGLX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FVGLX has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to FCNTX (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVGLX dropped -31.23% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

FVGLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVGLX and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer