PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVDFX vs. PSECX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FVDFX vs. PSECX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Value Discovery Fund (FVDFX) and 1789 Growth and Income Fund (PSECX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVDFX achieves a 10.28% return, which is significantly higher than PSECX's 3.23% return. Over the past 10 years, FVDFX has outperformed PSECX with an annualized return of 10.27%, while PSECX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.28% annualized return.


FVDFX

1D
0.23%
1M
2.89%
YTD
10.28%
6M
11.88%
1Y
24.90%
3Y*
14.37%
5Y*
8.16%
10Y*
10.27%

PSECX

1D
0.52%
1M
-0.66%
YTD
3.23%
6M
2.17%
1Y
8.22%
3Y*
11.87%
5Y*
7.00%
10Y*
7.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVDFX vs. PSECX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FVDFX
Fidelity Value Discovery Fund
10.28%16.92%8.48%5.32%-3.75%24.85%7.78%24.08%-10.26%14.18%
PSECX
1789 Growth and Income Fund
3.23%8.04%14.49%10.64%-10.66%25.43%0.78%23.99%-5.18%5.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FVDFX and PSECX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2013

0.87

The correlation between FVDFX and PSECX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVDFX vs. PSECX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVDFX
FVDFX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FVDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FVDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

PSECX
PSECX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
PSECX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSECX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSECX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
PSECX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSECX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVDFX vs. PSECX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Discovery Fund (FVDFX) and 1789 Growth and Income Fund (PSECX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FVDFXPSECXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.15

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.71

1.15

+2.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.09

4.26

+10.83

FVDFX vs. PSECX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVDFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the PSECX Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVDFX and PSECX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FVDFXPSECXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

0.87

+1.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.59

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.55

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.56

-0.06

Drawdowns

FVDFX vs. PSECX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVDFX drawdown since its inception was -60.88%, which is greater than PSECX's maximum drawdown of -31.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVDFX and PSECX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVDFXPSECXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.88%

-31.13%

-29.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.85%

-7.44%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.58%

-12.51%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.17%

-18.47%

+2.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.74%

-31.13%

-6.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-2.49%

+2.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.34%

-3.88%

-4.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

2.00%

-0.32%

Volatility

FVDFX vs. PSECX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Value Discovery Fund (FVDFX) is 2.55%, while 1789 Growth and Income Fund (PSECX) has a volatility of 2.71%. This indicates that FVDFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSECX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVDFXPSECXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.55%

2.71%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.46%

7.71%

-0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.24%

9.89%

+0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.41%

11.94%

+1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.73%

13.20%

+3.53%

FVDFX vs. PSECX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVDFX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than PSECX's 2.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

FVDFX vs. PSECX - Dividend Comparison

FVDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.02%, more than PSECX's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FVDFX
Fidelity Value Discovery Fund
8.02%8.84%5.34%5.23%4.71%4.76%1.31%2.96%3.44%1.91%1.16%3.40%
PSECX
1789 Growth and Income Fund
0.98%0.85%3.88%2.71%4.60%1.53%0.27%1.16%6.78%0.59%0.31%5.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


FVDFX and PSECX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSECX has higher volatility (2.71%) compared to FVDFX (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVDFX dropped -60.88% vs PSECX's -31.13%.

FVDFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVDFX and PSECX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer