PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVDFX vs. MDLVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FVDFX vs. MDLVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Value Discovery Fund (FVDFX) and BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Value Fund Investor A (MDLVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVDFX achieves a 17.75% return, which is significantly lower than MDLVX's 23.18% return. Over the past 10 years, FVDFX has underperformed MDLVX with an annualized return of 10.94%, while MDLVX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.87% annualized return.


FVDFX

1D
0.40%
1M
3.01%
6M
12.49%
YTD
17.75%
1Y
32.72%
3Y*
15.00%
5Y*
9.89%
10Y*
10.94%
ALL TIME*
9.96%

MDLVX

1D
0.64%
1M
2.57%
6M
16.82%
YTD
23.18%
1Y
39.31%
3Y*
20.60%
5Y*
12.79%
10Y*
12.87%
ALL TIME*
8.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FVDFX vs. MDLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FVDFX
Fidelity Value Discovery Fund
17.75%16.92%8.48%5.32%-3.75%24.85%7.78%24.08%-10.26%14.18%
MDLVX
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Value Fund Investor A
23.18%18.11%15.08%13.43%-8.89%26.20%3.64%24.39%-7.94%15.80%

Correlation

The correlation between FVDFX and MDLVX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2002

0.94

The correlation between FVDFX and MDLVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVDFX vs. MDLVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FVDFX
FVDFX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FVDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FVDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

MDLVX
MDLVX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
MDLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MDLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FVDFX vs. MDLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Discovery Fund (FVDFX) and BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Value Fund Investor A (MDLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FVDFXMDLVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.60

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.57

5.78

-1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.10

26.84

-7.74

FVDFX vs. MDLVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVDFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.98, which is comparable to the MDLVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVDFX and MDLVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FVDFX vs. MDLVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVDFX drawdown since its inception was -60.88%, which is greater than MDLVX's maximum drawdown of -55.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVDFX and MDLVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVDFXMDLVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.88%

-55.49%

-5.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.85%

-6.54%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.58%

-16.19%

+2.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.17%

-19.87%

+3.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.74%

-37.11%

-0.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.28%

-8.91%

+0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

1.41%

+0.23%

Volatility

FVDFX vs. MDLVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Value Discovery Fund (FVDFX) has a higher volatility of 3.08% compared to BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Value Fund Investor A (MDLVX) at 2.81%. This indicates that FVDFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDLVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVDFXMDLVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

2.81%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.83%

8.90%

-1.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.53%

11.38%

-0.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.37%

14.77%

-1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.65%

17.23%

-0.58%

FVDFX vs. MDLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVDFX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than MDLVX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

FVDFX vs. MDLVX - Dividend Comparison

FVDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.51%, less than MDLVX's 10.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FVDFX
Fidelity Value Discovery Fund
7.51%8.84%5.34%5.23%4.71%4.76%1.31%2.96%3.44%1.91%1.16%3.40%
MDLVX
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Value Fund Investor A
10.71%9.33%14.55%2.68%5.86%17.69%1.49%3.76%12.92%0.43%1.06%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FVDFX and MDLVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FVDFX has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to MDLVX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVDFX dropped -60.88% vs MDLVX's -55.49%.

MDLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 2.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVDFX and MDLVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer