FVDFX vs. FSLVX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FVDFX (Fidelity Value Discovery Fund) and FSLVX (Fidelity Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FVDFX returned 10.94%/yr vs 11.72%/yr for FSLVX. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. FVDFX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for FSLVX.

Performance

FVDFX vs. FSLVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Value Discovery Fund (FVDFX) and Fidelity Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FSLVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVDFX achieves a 17.75% return, which is significantly higher than FSLVX's 14.24% return. Over the past 10 years, FVDFX has underperformed FSLVX with an annualized return of 10.94%, while FSLVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.72% annualized return.

FVDFX

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 3.01%
• 6M: 12.49%
• YTD: 17.75%
• 1Y: 32.72%
• 3Y*: 15.00%
• 5Y*: 9.89%
• 10Y*: 10.94%
• ALL TIME*: 9.96%

FSLVX

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 2.74%
• 6M: 9.98%
• YTD: 14.24%
• 1Y: 26.73%
• 3Y*: 17.58%
• 5Y*: 12.11%
• 10Y*: 11.72%
• ALL TIME*: 8.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FSLVX Fidelity Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FVDFX Fidelity Value Discovery Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FVDFX vs. FSLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FVDFX Fidelity Value Discovery Fund	17.75%	16.92%	8.48%	5.32%	-3.75%	24.85%	7.78%	24.08%	-10.26%	14.18%
FSLVX Fidelity Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund	14.24%	15.95%	17.29%	14.44%	-5.53%	25.72%	4.14%	24.63%	-9.29%	12.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FVDFX and FSLVX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2002	0.96

The correlation between FVDFX and FSLVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FVDFX vs. FSLVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FVDFX

FVDFX Risk / Return Rank: 96
FVDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FVDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FVDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
FVDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FVDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

FSLVX

FSLVX Risk / Return Rank: 90
FSLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FSLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FSLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
FSLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FSLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FVDFX vs. FSLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Discovery Fund (FVDFX) and Fidelity Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FSLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FVDFX	FSLVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.98	2.33	+0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.25	3.33	+0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.42	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.57	3.58	+0.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.10	14.81	+4.29

FVDFX vs. FSLVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVDFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.98, which is comparable to the FSLVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVDFX and FSLVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FVDFX vs. FSLVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVDFX drawdown since its inception was -60.88%, roughly equal to the maximum FSLVX drawdown of -60.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVDFX and FSLVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FVDFX	FSLVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.88%	-60.89%	+0.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.85%	-7.01%	+0.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.58%	-15.62%	+2.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.17%	-19.33%	+3.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.74%	-39.75%	+2.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.40%	+0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.28%	-9.84%	+1.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.64%	1.69%	-0.05%

Volatility

FVDFX vs. FSLVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Value Discovery Fund (FVDFX) and Fidelity Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FSLVX) have volatilities of 3.08% and 3.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FVDFX	FSLVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.08%	3.08%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.83%	8.15%	-0.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.53%	10.82%	-0.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.37%	15.41%	-2.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.65%	17.66%	-1.01%

FVDFX vs. FSLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVDFX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FSLVX's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

FVDFX vs. FSLVX - Dividend Comparison

FVDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.51%, less than FSLVX's 8.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSLVX Fidelity Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund	8.69%	8.06%	10.40%	2.50%	8.31%	4.35%	2.18%	1.58%	7.55%	1.10%	1.29%	1.26%
FVDFX Fidelity Value Discovery Fund	7.51%	8.84%	5.34%	5.23%	4.71%	4.76%	1.31%	2.96%	3.44%	1.91%	1.16%	3.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FVDFX and FSLVX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, FVDFX and FSLVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FVDFX or FSLVX?

FSLVX has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to FVDFX (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVDFX dropped -60.88% vs FSLVX's -60.89%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FVDFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.