PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUTBX vs. VGIVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FUTBX vs. VGIVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUTBX) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VGIVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUTBX achieves a 0.07% return, which is significantly lower than VGIVX's 1.70% return.


FUTBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.07%
6M
-0.22%
1Y
4.03%
3Y*
2.91%
5Y*
-0.41%
10Y*

VGIVX

1D
0.22%
1M
1.04%
YTD
1.70%
6M
1.99%
1Y
11.36%
3Y*
9.79%
5Y*
2.38%
10Y*
3.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUTBX vs. VGIVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUTBX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund
0.07%6.12%0.70%4.19%-13.00%-2.54%7.76%7.30%0.95%2.28%
VGIVX
Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.70%13.05%6.31%10.48%-16.72%-2.41%5.83%14.03%-2.72%8.30%

Correlation

The correlation between FUTBX and VGIVX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.48

The correlation between FUTBX and VGIVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.68 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUTBX vs. VGIVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUTBX
FUTBX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
FUTBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUTBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUTBX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
FUTBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUTBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

VGIVX
VGIVX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VGIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
VGIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUTBX vs. VGIVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUTBX) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VGIVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FUTBXVGIVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.02

2.85

-1.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.51

4.53

-3.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.58

-0.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

2.98

-1.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.75

11.93

-8.18

FUTBX vs. VGIVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUTBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the VGIVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUTBX and VGIVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FUTBXVGIVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

2.85

-1.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

0.38

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.69

-0.44

Drawdowns

FUTBX vs. VGIVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUTBX drawdown since its inception was -19.69%, smaller than the maximum VGIVX drawdown of -26.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUTBX and VGIVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUTBXVGIVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.69%

-26.79%

+7.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.09%

-3.93%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.42%

-7.14%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.03%

-26.79%

+9.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.62%

-0.07%

-7.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.96%

-4.70%

-2.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

0.98%

+0.07%

Volatility

FUTBX vs. VGIVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUTBX) is 1.20%, while Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VGIVX) has a volatility of 1.56%. This indicates that FUTBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGIVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUTBXVGIVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.20%

1.56%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.72%

3.35%

-0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.87%

4.12%

-0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.81%

6.30%

-0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.15%

6.36%

-1.21%

FUTBX vs. VGIVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUTBX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VGIVX's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FUTBX vs. VGIVX - Dividend Comparison

FUTBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, less than VGIVX's 5.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUTBX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund
3.65%3.43%2.90%2.12%1.12%0.86%4.54%2.75%2.05%1.65%0.00%0.00%
VGIVX
Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares
5.88%5.95%6.58%5.53%5.32%3.53%4.21%4.62%4.62%4.67%4.76%4.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


FUTBX and VGIVX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGIVX has higher volatility (1.56%) compared to FUTBX (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUTBX dropped -19.69% vs VGIVX's -26.79%.

VGIVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUTBX and VGIVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer