PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUTBX vs. TBFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FUTBX vs. TBFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUTBX) and Thrivent Government Bond (TBFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUTBX achieves a 0.07% return, which is significantly higher than TBFAX's -0.21% return.


FUTBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.07%
6M
-0.22%
1Y
4.03%
3Y*
2.91%
5Y*
-0.41%
10Y*

TBFAX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.16%
YTD
-0.21%
6M
-0.34%
1Y
4.70%
3Y*
3.14%
5Y*
0.02%
10Y*
0.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUTBX vs. TBFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUTBX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund
0.07%6.12%0.70%4.19%-13.00%-2.54%7.76%7.30%0.95%2.28%
TBFAX
Thrivent Government Bond
-0.21%7.00%0.96%3.52%-10.67%-1.92%6.93%5.70%-0.02%1.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FUTBX and TBFAX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.94

The correlation between FUTBX and TBFAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUTBX vs. TBFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUTBX
FUTBX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
FUTBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUTBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUTBX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
FUTBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUTBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

TBFAX
TBFAX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
TBFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
TBFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUTBX vs. TBFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUTBX) and Thrivent Government Bond (TBFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FUTBXTBFAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.02

1.21

-0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.51

1.82

-0.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.21

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

1.43

-0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.75

4.33

-0.58

FUTBX vs. TBFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUTBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is comparable to the TBFAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUTBX and TBFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FUTBXTBFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

1.21

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

0.00

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.28

-0.03

Drawdowns

FUTBX vs. TBFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUTBX drawdown since its inception was -19.69%, which is greater than TBFAX's maximum drawdown of -17.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUTBX and TBFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUTBXTBFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.69%

-17.68%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.09%

-3.21%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.42%

-6.55%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.03%

-16.03%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.62%

-3.50%

-4.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.96%

-4.17%

-2.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

1.06%

-0.01%

Volatility

FUTBX vs. TBFAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUTBX) and Thrivent Government Bond (TBFAX) have volatilities of 1.20% and 1.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUTBXTBFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.20%

1.21%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.72%

2.64%

+0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.87%

3.80%

+0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.81%

5.64%

+0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.15%

4.72%

+0.43%

FUTBX vs. TBFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUTBX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than TBFAX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

FUTBX vs. TBFAX - Dividend Comparison

FUTBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than TBFAX's 3.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUTBX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund
3.65%3.43%2.90%2.12%1.12%0.86%4.54%2.75%2.05%1.65%0.00%0.00%
TBFAX
Thrivent Government Bond
3.48%3.54%3.73%2.29%2.08%0.92%3.29%2.08%2.02%1.48%1.25%0.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FUTBX and TBFAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TBFAX has higher volatility (1.21%) compared to FUTBX (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUTBX dropped -19.69% vs TBFAX's -17.68%.

TBFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUTBX and TBFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer