FUSS.L vs. SRIU.L
FUSS.L (Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced US Equity UCITS ETF Acc) and SRIU.L (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from Fidelity and UBS respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FUSS.L returned 13.47%/yr vs 11.37%/yr for SRIU.L. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FUSS.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for SRIU.L.
Performance
FUSS.L vs. SRIU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FUSS.L is traded in GBP, while SRIU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SRIU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUSS.L achieves a 9.84% return, which is significantly lower than SRIU.L's 13.09% return.
FUSS.L
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 9.48%
- YTD
- 9.84%
- 1Y
- 21.39%
- 3Y*
- 19.59%
- 5Y*
- 13.47%
- 10Y*
- —
SRIU.L
- 1D
- -1.80%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- 6M
- 12.13%
- YTD
- 13.09%
- 1Y
- 21.65%
- 3Y*
- 15.81%
- 5Y*
- 11.37%
- 10Y*
- —
FUSS.L vs. SRIU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUSS.L Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced US Equity UCITS ETF Acc | 9.84% | 9.86% | 28.35% | 22.16% | -11.82% | 28.48% | 13.94% |
SRIU.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 13.09% | 3.18% | 21.26% | 25.24% | -16.33% | 32.89% | 15.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between FUSS.L and SRIU.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2020 | 0.92 |
The correlation between FUSS.L and SRIU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FUSS.L vs. SRIU.L — Risk / Return Rank
FUSS.L
SRIU.L
FUSS.L vs. SRIU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced US Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FUSS.L) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FUSS.L | SRIU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.30 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 2.22 | +0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.05 | 7.07 | +1.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FUSS.L vs. SRIU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUSS.L drawdown since its inception was -22.13%, roughly equal to the maximum SRIU.L drawdown of -22.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUSS.L and SRIU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUSS.L | SRIU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.13% | -22.95% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.25% | -9.71% | +1.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.13% | -22.56% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.13% | -22.95% | +0.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.68% | -3.46% | +2.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.56% | -5.55% | +1.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | 3.05% | -0.69% |
Volatility
FUSS.L vs. SRIU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced US Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FUSS.L) is 3.16%, while UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIU.L) has a volatility of 5.09%. This indicates that FUSS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRIU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FUSS.L | SRIU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.16% | 5.09% | -1.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.23% | 10.40% | -2.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.04% | 13.19% | -1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.94% | 15.94% | -1.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.05% | 15.95% | -0.90% |
FUSS.L vs. SRIU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FUSS.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SRIU.L's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
FUSS.L vs. SRIU.L - Dividend Comparison
FUSS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SRIU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUSS.L Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced US Equity UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRIU.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.51% | 0.94% | 1.08% | 0.79% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FUSS.L and SRIU.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SRIU.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SRIU.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FUSS.L.
Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FUSS.L and 0.22% for SRIU.L.
Find the right allocation for FUSS.L and SRIU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer