PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUSD.L vs. IBTU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FUSD.L vs. IBTU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc (FUSD.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBTU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUSD.L achieves a 5.71% return, which is significantly higher than IBTU.L's 1.35% return.


FUSD.L

1D
-1.14%
1M
0.15%
YTD
5.71%
6M
6.40%
1Y
20.45%
3Y*
16.05%
5Y*
10.15%
10Y*

IBTU.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
YTD
1.35%
6M
1.76%
1Y
3.93%
3Y*
4.69%
5Y*
3.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUSD.L vs. IBTU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FUSD.L
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc
5.71%16.47%15.86%17.14%-12.08%24.36%10.46%16.72%
IBTU.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.35%4.33%5.31%4.92%1.05%0.10%0.88%2.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FUSD.L and IBTU.L is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2019

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUSD.L vs. IBTU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUSD.L
FUSD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FUSD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUSD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUSD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FUSD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUSD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

IBTU.L
IBTU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBTU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUSD.L vs. IBTU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc (FUSD.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBTU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FUSD.LIBTU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

3.47

-2.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

19.33

-16.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.20

83.95

-72.75

FUSD.L vs. IBTU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUSD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is lower than the IBTU.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUSD.L and IBTU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FUSD.LIBTU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

3.41

-1.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

3.34

-2.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

2.86

-2.11

Drawdowns

FUSD.L vs. IBTU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUSD.L drawdown since its inception was -35.98%, which is greater than IBTU.L's maximum drawdown of -0.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUSD.L and IBTU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUSD.LIBTU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.98%

-0.72%

-35.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.94%

-0.20%

-7.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.60%

-0.20%

-17.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.25%

-0.40%

-19.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

0.00%

-2.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-0.06%

-4.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

0.05%

+1.77%

Volatility

FUSD.L vs. IBTU.L - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc (FUSD.L) has a higher volatility of 2.96% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBTU.L) at 0.35%. This indicates that FUSD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUSD.LIBTU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

0.35%

+2.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.84%

0.82%

+7.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.40%

1.15%

+9.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.70%

1.01%

+13.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.80%

0.95%

+14.85%

FUSD.L vs. IBTU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUSD.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTU.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FUSD.L vs. IBTU.L - Dividend Comparison

FUSD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than IBTU.L's 4.07% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FUSD.L
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc
1.45%1.47%0.47%1.04%0.56%0.94%1.26%0.00%
IBTU.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.07%4.43%6.82%3.99%0.44%0.10%1.28%1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


FUSD.L and IBTU.L have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBTU.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBTU.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FUSD.L.

FUSD.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IBTU.L is Government Bonds. FUSD.L tracks Fidelity US Quality Income Index NR, while IBTU.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FUSD.L and 0.07% for IBTU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUSD.L and IBTU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer