FUSD.L vs. HSUS.L
FUSD.L (Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc) and HSUS.L (HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - FUSD.L tracks the Fidelity US Quality Income Index NR while HSUS.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FUSD.L returned 11.75%/yr vs 12.94%/yr for HSUS.L. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FUSD.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for HSUS.L.
Performance
FUSD.L vs. HSUS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FUSD.L is traded in USD, while HSUS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HSUS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUSD.L achieves a 7.97% return, which is significantly lower than HSUS.L's 14.24% return.
FUSD.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 7.97%
- 6M
- 8.45%
- 1Y
- 23.51%
- 3Y*
- 18.01%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- —
HSUS.L
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 7.73%
- YTD
- 14.24%
- 6M
- 16.46%
- 1Y
- 34.99%
- 3Y*
- 21.54%
- 5Y*
- 12.94%
- 10Y*
- —
FUSD.L vs. HSUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUSD.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc | 7.97% | 16.45% | 17.47% | 18.48% | -10.54% | 26.22% | 15.10% |
HSUS.L HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD | 14.25% | 19.15% | 19.80% | 21.17% | -17.59% | 28.58% | 20.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between FUSD.L and HSUS.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2020 | 0.87 |
The correlation between FUSD.L and HSUS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
FUSD.L vs. HSUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FUSD.L
HSUS.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
FUSD.L
HSUS.L
Financial Services
FUSD.L
HSUS.L
Communication Services
FUSD.L
HSUS.L
Consumer Cyclical
FUSD.L
HSUS.L
Healthcare
FUSD.L
HSUS.L
Industrials
FUSD.L
HSUS.L
Consumer Defensive
FUSD.L
HSUS.L
Energy
FUSD.L
HSUS.L
Utilities
FUSD.L
HSUS.L
Basic Materials
FUSD.L
HSUS.L
Real Estate
FUSD.L
HSUS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FUSD.L vs. HSUS.L — Risk / Return Rank
FUSD.L
HSUS.L
FUSD.L vs. HSUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc (FUSD.L) and HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FUSD.L | HSUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.57 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 4.35 | -1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.99 | 17.11 | -4.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FUSD.L | HSUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 3.24 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.86 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 1.08 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
FUSD.L vs. HSUS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUSD.L drawdown since its inception was -35.82%, which is greater than HSUS.L's maximum drawdown of -25.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUSD.L and HSUS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUSD.L | HSUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.82% | -25.41% | -10.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.94% | -8.00% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.61% | -20.00% | +2.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.41% | -25.41% | +6.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | 0.00% | -0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.88% | -5.22% | +1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 2.04% | -0.22% |
Volatility
FUSD.L vs. HSUS.L - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc (FUSD.L) and HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSUS.L) have volatilities of 2.91% and 2.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FUSD.L | HSUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 2.84% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.69% | 7.98% | -0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.29% | 10.77% | -0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.61% | 15.04% | -0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.78% | 15.37% | +0.41% |
FUSD.L vs. HSUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FUSD.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than HSUS.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FUSD.L vs. HSUS.L - Dividend Comparison
FUSD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, while HSUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUSD.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc | 1.42% | 1.47% | 1.85% | 2.10% | 2.31% | 2.30% | 2.30% | 1.95% | 2.19% | 1.24% |
HSUS.L HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FUSD.L and HSUS.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HSUS.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HSUS.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FUSD.L.
FUSD.L tracks Fidelity US Quality Income Index NR, while HSUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FUSD.L and 0.12% for HSUS.L.
Find the right allocation for FUSD.L and HSUS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer