FUSD.L vs. CAPU.L
FUSD.L (Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc) and CAPU.L (Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - FUSD.L tracks the Fidelity US Quality Income Index NR while CAPU.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FUSD.L returned 11.75%/yr vs 8.69%/yr for CAPU.L. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FUSD.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CAPU.L.
Performance
FUSD.L vs. CAPU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FUSD.L is traded in USD, while CAPU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CAPU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUSD.L achieves a 7.97% return, which is significantly higher than CAPU.L's -0.07% return.
FUSD.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 7.97%
- 6M
- 8.45%
- 1Y
- 23.51%
- 3Y*
- 18.01%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- —
CAPU.L
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 6.94%
- 3Y*
- 12.22%
- 5Y*
- 8.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.47%
FUSD.L vs. CAPU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUSD.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc | 7.97% | 16.45% | 17.47% | 18.48% | -10.54% | 26.22% | 11.82% | 31.47% | -4.52% | 16.21% |
CAPU.L Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust | -0.06% | 9.41% | 15.93% | 28.24% | -15.37% | 28.44% | 17.74% | 31.11% | -4.42% | 12.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between FUSD.L and CAPU.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2017 | 0.83 |
The correlation between FUSD.L and CAPU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FUSD.L vs. CAPU.L — Risk / Return Rank
FUSD.L
CAPU.L
FUSD.L vs. CAPU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc (FUSD.L) and Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust (CAPU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FUSD.L | CAPU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.12 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 0.76 | +2.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.99 | 2.37 | +10.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FUSD.L | CAPU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 0.67 | +1.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.57 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.78 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
FUSD.L vs. CAPU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUSD.L drawdown since its inception was -35.82%, roughly equal to the maximum CAPU.L drawdown of -34.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUSD.L and CAPU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUSD.L | CAPU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.82% | -34.23% | -1.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.94% | -9.12% | +1.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.61% | -13.99% | -3.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.41% | -21.13% | +1.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -4.34% | +4.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.88% | -3.80% | -0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 2.93% | -1.11% |
Volatility
FUSD.L vs. CAPU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc (FUSD.L) is 2.91%, while Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust (CAPU.L) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that FUSD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAPU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FUSD.L | CAPU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 3.59% | -0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.69% | 7.93% | -0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.29% | 10.27% | +0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.61% | 15.24% | -0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.78% | 16.24% | -0.46% |
FUSD.L vs. CAPU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FUSD.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CAPU.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
FUSD.L vs. CAPU.L - Dividend Comparison
FUSD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, while CAPU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAPU.L Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FUSD.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc | 1.42% | 1.47% | 1.85% | 2.10% | 2.31% | 2.30% | 2.30% | 1.95% | 2.19% | 1.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FUSD.L and CAPU.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FUSD.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FUSD.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CAPU.L.
FUSD.L tracks Fidelity US Quality Income Index NR, while CAPU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FUSD.L and 0.65% for CAPU.L.
Find the right allocation for FUSD.L and CAPU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer