FUSA.DE vs. JMLP.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FUSA.DE (Fidelity US Quality Income UCITS ETF Acc) and JMLP.DE (HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FUSA.DE is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Fidelity US Quality Income NR USD, while JMLP.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FUSA.DE returned 12.78%/yr vs 23.96%/yr for JMLP.DE. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FUSA.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for JMLP.DE.

Performance

FUSA.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Fidelity US Quality Income UCITS ETF Acc (FUSA.DE) and HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (JMLP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUSA.DE achieves a 8.98% return, which is significantly lower than JMLP.DE's 27.39% return.

FUSA.DE

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 3.18%
• YTD: 8.98%
• 6M: 8.57%
• 1Y: 21.54%
• 3Y*: 14.80%
• 5Y*: 12.78%
• 10Y*: —

JMLP.DE

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: 3.28%
• YTD: 27.39%
• 6M: 23.64%
• 1Y: 25.58%
• 3Y*: 24.31%
• 5Y*: 23.96%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUSA.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FUSA.DE Fidelity US Quality Income UCITS ETF Acc	8.98%	3.93%	24.26%	14.29%	-5.73%	37.53%	9.23%
JMLP.DE HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF	27.39%	-5.93%	44.53%	15.63%	34.66%	55.73%	7.58%

Correlation

The correlation between FUSA.DE and JMLP.DE is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.35
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2020	0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between FUSA.DE and JMLP.DE has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FUSA.DE vs. JMLP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUSA.DE

FUSA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 71
FUSA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FUSA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
FUSA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
FUSA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FUSA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 80

JMLP.DE

JMLP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 38
JMLP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
JMLP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
JMLP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
JMLP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
JMLP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUSA.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity US Quality Income UCITS ETF Acc (FUSA.DE) and HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (JMLP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FUSA.DE	JMLP.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	1.30	+0.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.00	1.81	+1.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.22	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.08	2.22	+1.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.57	6.04	+9.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FUSA.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUSA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the JMLP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUSA.DE and JMLP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FUSA.DE	JMLP.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.10	1.30	+0.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91	1.16	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	1.35	-0.55

Drawdowns

FUSA.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUSA.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.37%, which is greater than JMLP.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUSA.DE and JMLP.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	FUSA.DE	JMLP.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.37%	-22.29%	-13.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.24%	-11.02%	+5.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.86%	-22.29%	+0.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.86%	-22.29%	+0.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	-5.15%	+5.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.19%	-5.87%	+1.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.38%	4.05%	-2.67%

Volatility

FUSA.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity US Quality Income UCITS ETF Acc (FUSA.DE) is 2.49%, while HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (JMLP.DE) has a volatility of 6.65%. This indicates that FUSA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JMLP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FUSA.DE	JMLP.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.49%	6.65%	-4.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.52%	15.30%	-8.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.16%	18.80%	-8.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.91%	20.38%	-6.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.65%	21.66%	-6.01%

FUSA.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUSA.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than JMLP.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

FUSA.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Dividend Comparison

FUSA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JMLP.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FUSA.DE Fidelity US Quality Income UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JMLP.DE HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF	2.77%	3.38%	5.41%	11.39%	11.27%	14.07%	8.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FUSA.DE and JMLP.DE in my portfolio?

FUSA.DE and JMLP.DE have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FUSA.DE or JMLP.DE?

On fees, FUSA.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FUSA.DE or JMLP.DE?

FUSA.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for JMLP.DE.

What is the main difference between FUSA.DE and JMLP.DE?

FUSA.DE is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while JMLP.DE is Energy Equities. FUSA.DE tracks Fidelity US Quality Income NR USD, while JMLP.DE tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FUSA.DE and 0.40% for JMLP.DE.