PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUSA.DE vs. BTIC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FUSA.DE vs. BTIC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Fidelity US Quality Income UCITS ETF Acc (FUSA.DE) and Invesco Physical Bitcoin ETP (BTIC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FUSA.DE is traded in EUR, while BTIC.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BTIC.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUSA.DE achieves a 8.98% return, which is significantly higher than BTIC.DE's -25.63% return.


FUSA.DE

1D
-0.10%
1M
3.18%
YTD
8.98%
6M
8.57%
1Y
21.54%
3Y*
14.80%
5Y*
12.78%
10Y*

BTIC.DE

1D
-3.81%
1M
-20.62%
YTD
-25.63%
6M
-30.74%
1Y
-41.55%
3Y*
26.72%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUSA.DE vs. BTIC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FUSA.DE
Fidelity US Quality Income UCITS ETF Acc
8.98%3.93%24.26%14.29%-5.73%5.12%
BTIC.DE
Invesco Physical Bitcoin ETP
-25.62%-26.09%143.52%141.40%-61.47%-13.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FUSA.DE and BTIC.DE is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2021

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUSA.DE vs. BTIC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUSA.DE
FUSA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FUSA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUSA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUSA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FUSA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUSA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

BTIC.DE
BTIC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTIC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTIC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTIC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTIC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTIC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUSA.DE vs. BTIC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity US Quality Income UCITS ETF Acc (FUSA.DE) and Invesco Physical Bitcoin ETP (BTIC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FUSA.DEBTIC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

0.83

+0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.08

-0.83

+4.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.57

-1.47

+17.04

FUSA.DE vs. BTIC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUSA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the BTIC.DE Sharpe Ratio of -1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUSA.DE and BTIC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FUSA.DEBTIC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

-1.02

+3.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.03

+0.76

Drawdowns

FUSA.DE vs. BTIC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUSA.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.37%, smaller than the maximum BTIC.DE drawdown of -68.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUSA.DE and BTIC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUSA.DEBTIC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.37%

-68.94%

+33.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.24%

-49.68%

+44.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.86%

-53.62%

+31.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-52.21%

+52.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-31.90%

+27.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

28.15%

-26.77%

Volatility

FUSA.DE vs. BTIC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity US Quality Income UCITS ETF Acc (FUSA.DE) is 2.49%, while Invesco Physical Bitcoin ETP (BTIC.DE) has a volatility of 10.17%. This indicates that FUSA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTIC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUSA.DEBTIC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.49%

10.17%

-7.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.52%

31.94%

-25.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.16%

40.61%

-30.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.91%

50.56%

-36.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.65%

50.56%

-34.91%

FUSA.DE vs. BTIC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUSA.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BTIC.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

FUSA.DE vs. BTIC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither FUSA.DE nor BTIC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FUSA.DE and BTIC.DE have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BTIC.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BTIC.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FUSA.DE.

FUSA.DE is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while BTIC.DE is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FUSA.DE and 0.10% for BTIC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUSA.DE and BTIC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer