PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUMBX vs. VSCSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FUMBX vs. VSCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VSCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUMBX achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than VSCSX's 0.89% return.


FUMBX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.12%
6M
0.26%
YTD
0.33%
1Y
2.16%
3Y*
4.10%
5Y*
1.29%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.78%

VSCSX

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.04%
6M
0.56%
YTD
0.89%
1Y
3.08%
3Y*
5.51%
5Y*
2.36%
10Y*
2.67%
ALL TIME*
2.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FUMBX vs. VSCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUMBX
Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
0.33%5.83%3.25%4.47%-5.84%-1.38%4.22%4.19%1.47%-0.33%
VSCSX
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
0.89%6.75%5.36%6.11%-5.72%-0.43%5.06%6.85%0.88%-0.13%

Correlation

The correlation between FUMBX and VSCSX is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2017

0.83

The correlation between FUMBX and VSCSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUMBX vs. VSCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FUMBX
FUMBX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FUMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FUMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

VSCSX
VSCSX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VSCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VSCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FUMBX vs. VSCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VSCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FUMBXVSCSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.35

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

2.34

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.79

8.94

-5.15

FUMBX vs. VSCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUMBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the VSCSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUMBX and VSCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FUMBX vs. VSCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUMBX drawdown since its inception was -8.83%, smaller than the maximum VSCSX drawdown of -9.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUMBX and VSCSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUMBXVSCSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.83%

-9.36%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.54%

-1.36%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.57%

-1.36%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.40%

-9.27%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-0.18%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.84%

-0.97%

-0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.57%

0.36%

+0.21%

Volatility

FUMBX vs. VSCSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) has a higher volatility of 0.55% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VSCSX) at 0.50%. This indicates that FUMBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUMBXVSCSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.55%

0.50%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.59%

1.43%

+0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96%

1.73%

+0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.93%

2.73%

+0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.48%

2.37%

+0.11%

FUMBX vs. VSCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUMBX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VSCSX's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FUMBX vs. VSCSX - Dividend Comparison

FUMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, less than VSCSX's 4.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUMBX
Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
3.84%3.51%2.91%1.64%0.86%1.15%1.41%1.88%1.64%0.34%0.00%0.00%
VSCSX
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
4.44%4.32%4.27%3.07%1.98%1.78%2.25%2.85%2.66%2.26%1.93%2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


FUMBX and VSCSX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FUMBX has higher volatility (0.55%) compared to VSCSX (0.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUMBX dropped -8.83% vs VSCSX's -9.36%.

VSCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUMBX and VSCSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer