FUMBX vs. SGINX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) and DWS GNMA Fund (SGINX).
FUMBX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays 1-5 Year U.S. Treasury Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2005. SGINX is managed by DWS. It was launched on Jul 13, 2000.
Performance
FUMBX vs. SGINX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FUMBX vs. SGINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUMBX Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund | 0.16% | 5.83% | 3.25% | 4.47% | -5.84% | -1.38% | 4.22% | 4.19% | 1.47% | -0.33% |
SGINX DWS GNMA Fund | 0.68% | 7.88% | 0.59% | 4.93% | -11.82% | -1.12% | 3.29% | 6.65% | 0.42% | -0.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUMBX achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than SGINX's 0.68% return.
FUMBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 1.12%
- 1Y
- 3.92%
- 3Y*
- 3.89%
- 5Y*
- 1.36%
- 10Y*
- —
SGINX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- YTD
- 0.68%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 5.58%
- 3Y*
- 3.72%
- 5Y*
- 0.06%
- 10Y*
- 1.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FUMBX vs. SGINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FUMBX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SGINX's 0.58% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FUMBX vs. SGINX — Risk / Return Rank
FUMBX
SGINX
FUMBX vs. SGINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) and DWS GNMA Fund (SGINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FUMBX | SGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.65 | 1.31 | +0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.61 | 1.82 | +0.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.24 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 2.28 | +0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.60 | 6.82 | +1.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FUMBX | SGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 1.31 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.01 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.77 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between FUMBX and SGINX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FUMBX vs. SGINX - Dividend Comparison
FUMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, less than SGINX's 4.64% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUMBX Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund | 3.67% | 3.51% | 2.91% | 1.64% | 0.86% | 1.15% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 1.64% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SGINX DWS GNMA Fund | 4.64% | 3.77% | 3.97% | 3.82% | 1.86% | 1.37% | 2.22% | 2.94% | 2.71% | 3.07% | 2.95% | 3.41% |
Drawdowns
FUMBX vs. SGINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUMBX drawdown since its inception was -8.83%, smaller than the maximum SGINX drawdown of -17.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUMBX and SGINX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUMBX | SGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.83% | -17.37% | +8.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.54% | -2.96% | +1.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.60% | -17.18% | +8.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -1.41% | +0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.88% | -1.97% | +0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.44% | 0.99% | -0.55% |
Volatility
FUMBX vs. SGINX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) is 0.83%, while DWS GNMA Fund (SGINX) has a volatility of 1.39%. This indicates that FUMBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FUMBX | SGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.83% | 1.39% | -0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.39% | 2.41% | -1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32% | 4.51% | -2.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.89% | 6.39% | -3.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.49% | 4.78% | -2.29% |