PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUMBX vs. GPICX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FUMBX vs. GPICX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) and GuidepathConservative Income Fund (GPICX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUMBX achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly lower than GPICX's 1.10% return.


FUMBX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.26%
YTD
-0.01%
6M
0.34%
1Y
2.69%
3Y*
4.07%
5Y*
1.33%
10Y*

GPICX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.31%
YTD
1.10%
6M
1.20%
1Y
3.22%
3Y*
4.06%
5Y*
2.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUMBX vs. GPICX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FUMBX
Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
-0.01%5.83%3.25%4.47%-5.84%-1.38%4.22%4.19%2.03%
GPICX
GuidepathConservative Income Fund
1.10%3.49%4.73%4.87%-1.67%0.08%-0.23%2.30%0.80%

Correlation

The correlation between FUMBX and GPICX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2018

0.38

The correlation between FUMBX and GPICX shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUMBX vs. GPICX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUMBX
FUMBX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FUMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FUMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

GPICX
GPICX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
GPICX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPICX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPICX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
GPICX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPICX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUMBX vs. GPICX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) and GuidepathConservative Income Fund (GPICX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FUMBXGPICXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

2.95

-1.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

13.01

-11.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.33

67.56

-62.23

FUMBX vs. GPICX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUMBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the GPICX Sharpe Ratio of 4.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUMBX and GPICX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FUMBX vs. GPICX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUMBX drawdown since its inception was -8.83%, which is greater than GPICX's maximum drawdown of -3.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUMBX and GPICX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUMBXGPICXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.83%

-3.10%

-5.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.54%

-0.25%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.57%

-0.52%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.60%

-2.79%

-5.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.96%

0.00%

-0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.85%

-0.56%

-1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.52%

0.05%

+0.47%

Volatility

FUMBX vs. GPICX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) has a higher volatility of 0.71% compared to GuidepathConservative Income Fund (GPICX) at 0.17%. This indicates that FUMBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPICX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUMBXGPICXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.71%

0.17%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.56%

0.61%

+0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08%

0.79%

+1.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.93%

1.10%

+1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.49%

1.06%

+1.43%

FUMBX vs. GPICX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUMBX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than GPICX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FUMBX vs. GPICX - Dividend Comparison

FUMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, which matches GPICX's 3.80% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUMBX
Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
3.77%3.51%2.91%1.64%0.86%1.15%1.41%1.88%1.64%0.34%
GPICX
GuidepathConservative Income Fund
3.80%3.86%4.53%4.23%1.51%0.48%0.57%1.67%1.30%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FUMBX and GPICX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FUMBX has higher volatility (0.71%) compared to GPICX (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUMBX dropped -8.83% vs GPICX's -3.10%.

GPICX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.09 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUMBX and GPICX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer