PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUMBX vs. FJRLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FUMBX vs. FJRLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) and Fidelity Limited Term Bond Fund (FJRLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUMBX achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than FJRLX's 0.71% return.


FUMBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.07%
YTD
0.19%
6M
0.46%
1Y
3.39%
3Y*
4.03%
5Y*
1.31%
10Y*

FJRLX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.35%
YTD
0.71%
6M
1.05%
1Y
4.60%
3Y*
5.49%
5Y*
2.21%
10Y*
2.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUMBX vs. FJRLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUMBX
Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
0.19%5.83%3.25%4.47%-5.84%-1.38%4.22%4.19%1.47%-0.33%
FJRLX
Fidelity Limited Term Bond Fund
0.71%6.70%4.92%6.26%-6.22%-1.46%5.16%6.04%0.71%-0.13%

Correlation

The correlation between FUMBX and FJRLX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2017

0.84

The correlation between FUMBX and FJRLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUMBX vs. FJRLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUMBX
FUMBX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FUMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FUMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

FJRLX
FJRLX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FJRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FJRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUMBX vs. FJRLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) and Fidelity Limited Term Bond Fund (FJRLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FUMBXFJRLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.65

2.15

-0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.66

3.75

-1.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.47

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

2.84

-0.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.08

10.78

-3.70

FUMBX vs. FJRLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUMBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the FJRLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUMBX and FJRLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FUMBXFJRLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

2.15

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.80

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

1.03

-0.30

Drawdowns

FUMBX vs. FJRLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUMBX drawdown since its inception was -8.83%, smaller than the maximum FJRLX drawdown of -9.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUMBX and FJRLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUMBXFJRLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.83%

-9.89%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.54%

-1.63%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.57%

-1.63%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.60%

-9.71%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-0.26%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.86%

-1.34%

-0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

0.43%

+0.05%

Volatility

FUMBX vs. FJRLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) is 0.69%, while Fidelity Limited Term Bond Fund (FJRLX) has a volatility of 0.74%. This indicates that FUMBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FJRLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUMBXFJRLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.69%

0.74%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.49%

1.62%

-0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06%

2.15%

-0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.92%

2.76%

+0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.49%

2.41%

+0.08%

FUMBX vs. FJRLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUMBX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FJRLX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FUMBX vs. FJRLX - Dividend Comparison

FUMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, less than FJRLX's 4.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FJRLX
Fidelity Limited Term Bond Fund
4.08%3.93%3.36%2.38%1.26%1.25%2.38%2.44%2.29%1.79%1.88%1.60%
FUMBX
Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
3.76%3.51%2.91%1.64%0.86%1.15%1.41%1.88%1.64%0.34%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FUMBX and FJRLX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FJRLX has higher volatility (0.74%) compared to FUMBX (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUMBX dropped -8.83% vs FJRLX's -9.89%.

FJRLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUMBX and FJRLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer