FUMBX vs. FJRLX
FUMBX (Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund) and FJRLX (Fidelity Limited Term Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - FUMBX is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. 1-5 Year Treasury Bond Index, while FJRLX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FUMBX returned 1.29%/yr vs 2.02%/yr for FJRLX. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FUMBX charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FJRLX.
Performance
FUMBX vs. FJRLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUMBX achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than FJRLX's 0.53% return.
FUMBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 1Y
- 2.16%
- 3Y*
- 4.10%
- 5Y*
- 1.29%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.78%
FJRLX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- 6M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 0.53%
- 1Y
- 2.75%
- 3Y*
- 5.12%
- 5Y*
- 2.02%
- 10Y*
- 2.29%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.27%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FUMBX vs. FJRLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUMBX Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund | 0.33% | 5.83% | 3.25% | 4.47% | -5.84% | -1.38% | 4.22% | 4.19% | 1.47% | -0.33% |
FJRLX Fidelity Limited Term Bond Fund | 0.53% | 6.70% | 4.62% | 6.26% | -6.22% | -1.46% | 5.16% | 6.04% | 0.71% | -0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between FUMBX and FJRLX is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2017 | 0.84 |
The correlation between FUMBX and FJRLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FUMBX vs. FJRLX — Risk / Return Rank
FUMBX
FJRLX
FUMBX vs. FJRLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) and Fidelity Limited Term Bond Fund (FJRLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FUMBX | FJRLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.28 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 1.75 | -0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.79 | 6.32 | -2.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FUMBX vs. FJRLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUMBX drawdown since its inception was -8.83%, smaller than the maximum FJRLX drawdown of -9.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUMBX and FJRLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUMBX | FJRLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.83% | -9.89% | +1.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.54% | -1.63% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.57% | -1.63% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.40% | -9.57% | +1.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -9.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | -0.44% | -0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.84% | -1.33% | -0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.57% | 0.45% | +0.12% |
Volatility
FUMBX vs. FJRLX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) has a higher volatility of 0.55% compared to Fidelity Limited Term Bond Fund (FJRLX) at 0.50%. This indicates that FUMBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FJRLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FUMBX | FJRLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.55% | 0.50% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.59% | 1.70% | -0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96% | 2.09% | -0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.93% | 2.78% | +0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.48% | 2.41% | +0.07% |
FUMBX vs. FJRLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FUMBX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FJRLX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
FUMBX vs. FJRLX - Dividend Comparison
FUMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, more than FJRLX's 3.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJRLX Fidelity Limited Term Bond Fund | 3.78% | 3.93% | 3.08% | 2.38% | 1.26% | 1.25% | 2.38% | 2.44% | 2.29% | 1.79% | 1.88% | 1.60% |
FUMBX Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund | 3.84% | 3.51% | 2.91% | 1.64% | 0.86% | 1.15% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 1.64% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FUMBX and FJRLX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FUMBX has higher volatility (0.55%) compared to FJRLX (0.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUMBX dropped -8.83% vs FJRLX's -9.89%.
FJRLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FUMBX and FJRLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer