FUMBX vs. FCSTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) and Fidelity California Limited Term Tax-Free Bond Fund (FCSTX).
FUMBX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays 1-5 Year U.S. Treasury Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2005. FCSTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 25, 2005.
Performance
FUMBX vs. FCSTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FUMBX vs. FCSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUMBX Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund | 0.16% | 5.83% | 3.25% | 4.47% | -5.84% | -1.38% | 4.22% | 4.19% | 1.47% | -0.33% |
FCSTX Fidelity California Limited Term Tax-Free Bond Fund | -0.30% | 5.23% | 1.73% | 3.53% | -4.71% | 0.20% | 2.93% | 4.07% | 1.25% | -0.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUMBX achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly higher than FCSTX's -0.30% return.
FUMBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 1.12%
- 1Y
- 3.92%
- 3Y*
- 3.89%
- 5Y*
- 1.36%
- 10Y*
- —
FCSTX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- -0.30%
- 6M
- 0.28%
- 1Y
- 3.43%
- 3Y*
- 2.88%
- 5Y*
- 1.16%
- 10Y*
- 1.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FUMBX vs. FCSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FUMBX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FCSTX's 0.47% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FUMBX vs. FCSTX — Risk / Return Rank
FUMBX
FCSTX
FUMBX vs. FCSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) and Fidelity California Limited Term Tax-Free Bond Fund (FCSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FUMBX | FCSTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.65 | 1.58 | +0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.61 | 2.11 | +0.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.50 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 1.64 | +0.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.60 | 6.19 | +2.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FUMBX | FCSTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 1.58 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.56 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 1.23 | -0.50 |
Correlation
The correlation between FUMBX and FCSTX is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FUMBX vs. FCSTX - Dividend Comparison
FUMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than FCSTX's 2.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUMBX Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund | 3.67% | 3.51% | 2.91% | 1.64% | 0.86% | 1.15% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 1.64% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCSTX Fidelity California Limited Term Tax-Free Bond Fund | 2.22% | 2.85% | 2.00% | 1.68% | 1.01% | 1.22% | 1.68% | 1.72% | 1.71% | 1.58% | 1.89% | 1.63% |
Drawdowns
FUMBX vs. FCSTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUMBX drawdown since its inception was -8.83%, which is greater than FCSTX's maximum drawdown of -7.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUMBX and FCSTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUMBX | FCSTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.83% | -7.58% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.54% | -2.21% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.60% | -7.58% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -7.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -1.69% | +0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.88% | -0.92% | -0.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.44% | 0.59% | -0.15% |
Volatility
FUMBX vs. FCSTX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) has a higher volatility of 0.83% compared to Fidelity California Limited Term Tax-Free Bond Fund (FCSTX) at 0.61%. This indicates that FUMBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FUMBX | FCSTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.83% | 0.61% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.39% | 0.99% | +0.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32% | 2.25% | +0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.89% | 2.08% | +0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.49% | 2.20% | +0.29% |