FULBX vs. PAIPX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FULBX (Federated Hermes Ultra Short Bond Fund) and PAIPX (PIMCO Short Asset Investment Fund) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, FULBX returned 2.46%/yr vs 2.51%/yr for PAIPX. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FULBX charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for PAIPX.

Performance

FULBX vs. PAIPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Ultra Short Bond Fund (FULBX) and PIMCO Short Asset Investment Fund (PAIPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FULBX achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than PAIPX's 1.80% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FULBX having a 2.46% annualized return and PAIPX not far ahead at 2.51%.

FULBX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 1.40%
• 6M: 1.90%
• 1Y: 4.93%
• 3Y*: 5.10%
• 5Y*: 3.12%
• 10Y*: 2.46%

PAIPX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 1.80%
• 6M: 2.25%
• 1Y: 4.65%
• 3Y*: 5.16%
• 5Y*: 3.36%
• 10Y*: 2.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FULBX vs. PAIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FULBX Federated Hermes Ultra Short Bond Fund	1.40%	5.50%	5.35%	5.15%	-1.31%	0.02%	2.29%	3.32%	1.24%	1.37%
PAIPX PIMCO Short Asset Investment Fund	1.80%	4.83%	5.93%	4.55%	-0.00%	-0.19%	1.12%	2.56%	1.90%	1.82%

Correlation

The correlation between FULBX and PAIPX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2012	0.30

The correlation between FULBX and PAIPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (3 years) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FULBX vs. PAIPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FULBX

FULBX Risk / Return Rank: 97
FULBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FULBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FULBX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FULBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FULBX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

PAIPX

PAIPX Risk / Return Rank: 100
PAIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
PAIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
PAIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
PAIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
PAIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FULBX vs. PAIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Ultra Short Bond Fund (FULBX) and PIMCO Short Asset Investment Fund (PAIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FULBX	PAIPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.13	3.93	-0.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	8.67	26.36	-17.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.67	16.16	-13.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.25	46.81	-37.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	42.84	185.02	-142.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FULBX vs. PAIPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FULBX Sharpe Ratio is 3.13, which is comparable to the PAIPX Sharpe Ratio of 3.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FULBX and PAIPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FULBX	PAIPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.13	3.93	-0.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	2.28	2.02	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.96	1.87	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.10	1.75	-0.65

Drawdowns

FULBX vs. PAIPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FULBX drawdown since its inception was -5.43%, which is greater than PAIPX's maximum drawdown of -3.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FULBX and PAIPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FULBX	PAIPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.43%	-3.49%	-1.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.54%	-0.10%	-0.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.54%	-1.20%	+0.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-2.60%	-1.64%	-0.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-4.67%	-3.49%	-1.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.80%	-0.15%	-0.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.12%	0.03%	+0.09%

Volatility

FULBX vs. PAIPX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Ultra Short Bond Fund (FULBX) has a higher volatility of 0.48% compared to PIMCO Short Asset Investment Fund (PAIPX) at 0.32%. This indicates that FULBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAIPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FULBX	PAIPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.48%	0.32%	+0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.15%	0.85%	+0.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.58%	1.19%	+0.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.37%	1.67%	-0.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.26%	1.35%	-0.09%

FULBX vs. PAIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FULBX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than PAIPX's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

FULBX vs. PAIPX - Dividend Comparison

FULBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, more than PAIPX's 3.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FULBX Federated Hermes Ultra Short Bond Fund	4.60%	4.79%	3.99%	2.67%	1.00%	0.56%	1.49%	2.16%	1.90%	1.25%	0.84%	0.64%
PAIPX PIMCO Short Asset Investment Fund	3.93%	4.29%	5.04%	4.04%	1.21%	0.31%	1.00%	2.53%	2.28%	1.81%	1.21%	0.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FULBX and PAIPX in my portfolio?

FULBX and PAIPX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FULBX or PAIPX?

FULBX has higher volatility (0.48%) compared to PAIPX (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FULBX dropped -5.43% vs PAIPX's -3.49%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PAIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.93 vs 3.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.