PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUEL.AX vs. QOZ.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FUEL.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF (FUEL.AX) and BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF (QOZ.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUEL.AX achieves a 24.46% return, which is significantly higher than QOZ.AX's 5.36% return. Over the past 10 years, FUEL.AX has underperformed QOZ.AX with an annualized return of 5.96%, while QOZ.AX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.91% annualized return.


FUEL.AX

1D
-0.73%
1M
-0.67%
6M
17.84%
YTD
24.46%
1Y
30.85%
3Y*
13.25%
5Y*
15.31%
10Y*
5.96%

QOZ.AX

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.89%
6M
4.91%
YTD
5.36%
1Y
14.79%
3Y*
11.72%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
8.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUEL.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUEL.AX
Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF
24.46%10.28%-1.04%-2.17%37.74%29.02%-32.28%10.04%-11.41%2.28%
QOZ.AX
BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF
5.36%14.57%8.09%8.49%3.17%17.17%-0.13%18.60%-5.96%9.73%

Correlation

The correlation between FUEL.AX and QOZ.AX is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2016

0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between FUEL.AX and QOZ.AX has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUEL.AX vs. QOZ.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUEL.AX
FUEL.AX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FUEL.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUEL.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUEL.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FUEL.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUEL.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

QOZ.AX
QOZ.AX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
QOZ.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QOZ.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
QOZ.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
QOZ.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
QOZ.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUEL.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF (FUEL.AX) and BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF (QOZ.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FUEL.AXQOZ.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.23

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

1.82

+0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.20

4.58

+2.62

FUEL.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUEL.AX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the QOZ.AX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUEL.AX and QOZ.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FUEL.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUEL.AX drawdown since its inception was -65.66%, which is greater than QOZ.AX's maximum drawdown of -37.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUEL.AX and QOZ.AX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUEL.AXQOZ.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.66%

-37.05%

-28.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.87%

-8.60%

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.90%

-13.67%

-9.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.54%

-14.87%

-8.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.66%

-37.05%

-28.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.65%

-3.17%

-4.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.62%

-4.61%

-9.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.37%

3.44%

+0.93%

Volatility

FUEL.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Volatility Comparison

Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF (FUEL.AX) has a higher volatility of 5.70% compared to BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF (QOZ.AX) at 2.43%. This indicates that FUEL.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QOZ.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUEL.AXQOZ.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.70%

2.43%

+3.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.38%

9.38%

+10.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.36%

11.91%

+10.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.26%

12.87%

+11.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.38%

14.67%

+11.71%

Dividends

FUEL.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Dividend Comparison

FUEL.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, more than QOZ.AX's 2.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUEL.AX
Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF
3.37%0.00%2.16%0.00%0.00%4.04%1.64%1.25%1.92%3.02%0.00%0.00%
QOZ.AX
BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF
2.26%2.07%2.42%2.75%4.97%3.96%3.30%6.45%4.28%1.82%3.62%6.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


FUEL.AX and QOZ.AX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FUEL.AX is categorized as Global Equities, while QOZ.AX is Large Cap Value Equities. FUEL.AX tracks Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged Index, while QOZ.AX tracks FTSE RAFI Australia 200 Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUEL.AX and QOZ.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer