FUEL.AX vs. AUDS.AX

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

FUEL.AX (Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF) and AUDS.AX (BetaShares Strong Australian Dollar Complex ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FUEL.AX is a Global Equities fund tracking the Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged Index, while AUDS.AX is a Leveraged Currency fund actively managed by BetaShares. FUEL.AX is passively managed, while AUDS.AX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FUEL.AX returned 15.37%/yr vs -6.34%/yr for AUDS.AX. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FUEL.AX vs. AUDS.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF (FUEL.AX) and BetaShares Strong Australian Dollar Complex ETF (AUDS.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUEL.AX achieves a 24.77% return, which is significantly higher than AUDS.AX's 11.13% return.

FUEL.AX

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 2.61%
• 6M: 21.01%
• YTD: 24.77%
• 1Y: 32.20%
• 3Y*: 13.02%
• 5Y*: 15.37%
• 10Y*: 5.97%

AUDS.AX

• 1D: -0.94%
• 1M: -2.09%
• 6M: 10.95%
• YTD: 11.13%
• 1Y: 19.39%
• 3Y*: 0.40%
• 5Y*: -6.34%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUEL.AX vs. AUDS.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FUEL.AX Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF	24.77%	10.28%	-1.04%	-2.17%	37.74%	29.02%	-32.28%	10.04%	-11.41%	2.28%
AUDS.AX BetaShares Strong Australian Dollar Complex ETF	11.13%	17.80%	-21.57%	-2.54%	-21.29%	-17.41%	10.39%	-5.64%	-22.18%	15.90%

Correlation

The correlation between FUEL.AX and AUDS.AX is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 28, 2016	0.23

The correlation between FUEL.AX and AUDS.AX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FUEL.AX vs. AUDS.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUEL.AX

FUEL.AX Risk / Return Rank: 57
FUEL.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
FUEL.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
FUEL.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FUEL.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
FUEL.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

AUDS.AX

AUDS.AX Risk / Return Rank: 37
AUDS.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
AUDS.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
AUDS.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
AUDS.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
AUDS.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUEL.AX vs. AUDS.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF (FUEL.AX) and BetaShares Strong Australian Dollar Complex ETF (AUDS.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FUEL.AX	AUDS.AX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	0.95	+0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	1.53	+0.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.17	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.42	1.73	+0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.19	4.38	+2.81

FUEL.AX vs. AUDS.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUEL.AX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is higher than the AUDS.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUEL.AX and AUDS.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FUEL.AX vs. AUDS.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUEL.AX drawdown since its inception was -65.66%, roughly equal to the maximum AUDS.AX drawdown of -67.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUEL.AX and AUDS.AX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FUEL.AX	AUDS.AX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.66%	-67.00%	+1.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.87%	-10.87%	-2.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.90%	-29.91%	+7.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.54%	-50.71%	+27.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-65.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.42%	-52.47%	+45.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.62%	-39.53%	+25.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.40%	4.23%	+0.17%

Volatility

FUEL.AX vs. AUDS.AX - Volatility Comparison

Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF (FUEL.AX) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to BetaShares Strong Australian Dollar Complex ETF (AUDS.AX) at 4.47%. This indicates that FUEL.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUDS.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FUEL.AX	AUDS.AX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.61%	4.47%	+1.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.38%	16.66%	+2.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.34%	19.93%	+2.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.25%	24.05%	+0.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.38%	24.52%	+1.86%

Dividends

FUEL.AX vs. AUDS.AX - Dividend Comparison

FUEL.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, less than AUDS.AX's 8.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AUDS.AX BetaShares Strong Australian Dollar Complex ETF	8.67%	0.00%	3.28%	0.00%	0.00%	5.45%	10.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FUEL.AX Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF	3.36%	0.00%	2.16%	0.00%	0.00%	4.04%	1.64%	1.25%	1.92%	3.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FUEL.AX and AUDS.AX in my portfolio?

FUEL.AX and AUDS.AX have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between FUEL.AX and AUDS.AX?

FUEL.AX is categorized as Global Equities, while AUDS.AX is Leveraged Currency.