PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTZIX vs. CIHIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTZIX vs. CIHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund (FTZIX) and Cullen International High Dividend Fund (CIHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTZIX achieves a 21.29% return, which is significantly higher than CIHIX's 11.20% return.


FTZIX

1D
0.03%
1M
0.37%
6M
12.63%
YTD
21.29%
1Y
40.83%
3Y*
25.68%
5Y*
14.33%
10Y*

CIHIX

1D
0.75%
1M
0.14%
6M
7.53%
YTD
11.20%
1Y
22.06%
3Y*
16.68%
5Y*
9.52%
10Y*
7.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTZIX vs. CIHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FTZIX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund
21.29%22.63%25.31%27.18%-21.31%25.25%19.60%33.70%0.00%
CIHIX
Cullen International High Dividend Fund
11.20%29.49%4.12%17.81%-11.99%11.24%3.07%21.30%0.46%

Correlation

The correlation between FTZIX and CIHIX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2018

0.61

The correlation between FTZIX and CIHIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTZIX vs. CIHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTZIX
FTZIX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FTZIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTZIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTZIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FTZIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTZIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

CIHIX
CIHIX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
CIHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
CIHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTZIX vs. CIHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund (FTZIX) and Cullen International High Dividend Fund (CIHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTZIXCIHIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.35

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.55

2.21

+2.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.03

7.15

+9.88

FTZIX vs. CIHIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTZIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the CIHIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTZIX and CIHIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTZIX vs. CIHIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTZIX drawdown since its inception was -37.22%, smaller than the maximum CIHIX drawdown of -59.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTZIX and CIHIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTZIXCIHIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.22%

-59.67%

+22.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-10.14%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.65%

-12.57%

-6.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.53%

-27.10%

-2.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.69%

-1.32%

-2.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.43%

-14.49%

+8.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

3.12%

-0.71%

Volatility

FTZIX vs. CIHIX - Volatility Comparison

Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund (FTZIX) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to Cullen International High Dividend Fund (CIHIX) at 3.40%. This indicates that FTZIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTZIXCIHIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.01%

3.40%

+1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.58%

9.76%

+3.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.05%

11.90%

+5.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.58%

13.29%

+6.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.29%

14.16%

+8.13%

FTZIX vs. CIHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTZIX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than CIHIX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTZIX vs. CIHIX - Dividend Comparison

FTZIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than CIHIX's 4.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIHIX
Cullen International High Dividend Fund
4.08%3.18%5.22%4.04%1.16%3.01%2.22%3.54%3.13%3.35%3.09%2.93%
FTZIX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund
0.04%0.05%0.11%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.26%0.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTZIX and CIHIX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTZIX has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to CIHIX (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTZIX dropped -37.22% vs CIHIX's -59.67%.

FTZIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTZIX and CIHIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer